I think they have Eric, if you put a bunch of photons in a reflective box,
the resistance to acceleration of the box is increased by the presence of
the photons just consider the blue/red shifting of the energy of the
reflecting photons.
And I believe it is considered likely that photons also
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:54 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would have been a surprise to find that nanovortices did not have mass
since they obviously have energy.
Mass is a tricky thing. Photons have no rest mass, for example, even
though they can carry as much energy as you
Eric
Photons are never at rest as far as I know. They do carry momentum and when
they interact impart momentum to rest mass items. In addition neutrinos are
thought to have some mass and they are never at rest as far as I know.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
- Original Message -
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:vortex mass
Dave--
That a correct assessment IMHO.
In addition the idea that the energy associated with the decay of a vortex
escapes the system as a high
After Physics, deep notions about physics, new book, David Z. Albert:
KurzweilAI dot net: Rich Murray 2015.02.03
After Physics, deep notions about physics, new book, David Z. Albert:
KurzweilAI dot net: Rich Murray 2015.02.03
Photons may not have rest mass, but they do carry momentum and energy. These
parameters are at a magnitude determined by E=MC^2.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Feb 3, 2015 11:42 pm
Subject: Re:
There is something that keeps this from happening Eric. As you speed up from
your frame of reference toward what you perceive as the frame of rest of the
photon you will never catch up to it. It will always appear to be moving at
the speed of light relative to you.
As you move faster in the
I see evidence that what we refer to as electromagnetic fields actually have
mass distributed throughout their spatial distribution. This is due in part to
the calculations of the energy located within a field. If you recall fields
studies during your college years one of the parameters that
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Photons are never at rest as far as I know.
One question I have -- is there anything keeping them from being considered
at rest within their own frame of reference?
Eric
https://carnegiescience.edu/news/cosmic_accounting_reveals_missing_light_crisis
The extreme ultraviolet light source crisis could indicate LENR is the
cause of both Dark Matter and Dark Energy. LENR could be blowing the
universe apart with the production of all this XUV over the last few
billion
Umm . . . they spelled calibration wrong. It is unprofessional.
Lugano Thermal Verification - Caibration
It just demonstrates that there is a lot to learn about physics. LENR is
certainly going to open a lot of doors as it becomes better understood.
It would have been a surprise to find that nanovortices did not have mass since
they obviously have energy. Now someone could make a point that
MFMP have laid out their schedule for testing the Rossi style high
temperature E-Cat.
*DogBone Week, Live Now*
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/446-dogbone-week-live-now
Adrian Ashfield
Dear Friends,
The race of Hot Cat replication will be more and more diversified .
This:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/how-i-have-replicated-hot-cat-once.html
is my personal contribution, in the very spirit of the old Hungarian
proverb: Only a fool dances better than he can!
During the
I am following their comments as best I can. If they are using a waveform
cutting circuit such as with SCR's then the fundamental current will be shifted
in time as compared to one that is not cut up.
I would measure the RMS voltage at 60 hertz, and read the fundamental 60 hertz
current.
There was a voltage multiplier set in the setup of the PCE that has been
corrected. In-line measurements are being used to verify the setup of the
PCE. I don't think they should be using the SCR controller - I would
rather they use the variac. The load should be pretty much flat-on
resistive
The PCE830 will take this into account for all of the harmonics
automatically once it is setup properly. It should be a nearly perfectly
resistive load until over 100kHz, which makes it only a small problem with
using the inline meters. Once they have the PCE setup properly, then they
are in
The guys performing the test are being tricked by the phase shift between the
current and the supply voltage. A triac controller will cause that to happen.
Can someone contact them directly and let them know that this may be the
hangup. It is painful to watch them chasing this problem.
I
They should celebrate their spell checker.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Umm . . . they spelled calibration wrong. It is unprofessional.
Lugano Thermal Verification - Caibration
The variac is the best way to be sure of the results. Another alternative
would be to measure the RMS current and square that and multiply by the load
resisance. Even a chopped waveform will give accurate results with that method.
The PCE830 is designed to take that into consideration unless
If only it could be that simple ... the wire resistance is changing as a
function of temperature. For the Kanthal A1 wire, it is not changing too
much though. But it is still a good and easy sanity check measurement.
Bob
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:16 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Good point Bob. I always like to have sanity checks to back up main, important
measurements.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Feb 3, 2015 4:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP testing schedule
If only it
22 matches
Mail list logo
