Post by MFMP:
https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/934143689949664
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Great post by MFMP:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Cook
Great post by MFMP:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Cook
Jones--
What about Levi's Ni isotopic changes? Does your 1COP2 fit with those
observations, which seem to suggest more than your f/H idea? Or were both
of Levi's isotopic
conception = consumption
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The way to maximize the COP is to apply energy pumping (heat) for a short
a period as possible to minimize energy input conception. The Lagano test
did not do that. The testers applied heat all the
Another kind, sort of, good news it is that the temperature is below the
melting point of nickel. So, we don't have another factor to make things
worse.
Adrian,
With a COP of 2 in any single unit - it is possible using stacking and feedback
of many units – for the operator to achieve any arbitrarily high net COP – even
infinite COP (no input required).
For instance with 50 units in a module, none of which have a COP of greater
than 2,
Jones,
I had speculated earlier that the COP of the Hot Cat might be lower than
the regular E-Cat as the low temperature version is what Rossi has
pursued. As Rossi has claimed a COP of at least 6 in earler days it is
not a stretch to think that he is expecting 6 from the new 1 MW plant
RE: [Vo]:Critique of Levi et al. Lugano experimentJones--
What about Levi's Ni isotopic changes? Does your 1COP2 fit with those
observations, which seem to suggest more than your f/H idea? Or were both of
Levi's isotopic analyses incorrect as well?
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
The way to maximize the COP is to apply energy pumping (heat) for a short
a period as possible to minimize energy input conception. The Lagano test
did not do that. The testers applied heat all the time. That is like
running your car in first gear. Your gas milage will be very bad.
On Fri, Mar 6,
RE: [Vo]:Critique of Levi et al. Lugano experimentJones--
Do you know of any easy way to make the isotopic ratios that Levi says he
found. If they are correct, however they were created was a pretty significant
feat IMHO.
I wonder what the Swedes are getting to say about the reality of the
From: Bob Cook
Jones--
What about Levi's Ni isotopic changes? Does your 1COP2 fit with those
observations, which seem to suggest more than your f/H idea? Or were both of
Levi's isotopic analyses incorrect as well?
Bob,
Well - the analyses were correct, insofar as you do not
See:
http://www.unconv-science.org/en/n7/parkhomov/
http://www.unconv-science.org/pdf/7/parkhomov-en.pdf
I do not think there is any new information here.
- Jed
Dear Friends,
One of the papers signalled today speaks about Rossi being on high anxiety
for his 1MW plant.
I have to confess that I am also on high anxiety for the Lugano-Parkhomov
replication plan that seemed to be a Blitzkrieg but now
it slowed down, before having effectively started.
I hope
See:
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2015/03/02/tpr2-calorimetry-of-hot-cat-performed-by-means-of-ir-camera-2/
TPR2 – Calorimetry of Hot-Cat performed by means of IR camera
Pubblicato il 2 marzo 2015di gsvit
First issue: 08/02/2015
Introduction
Some recent experimental measurements by the Martin
From: Jed Rothwell
*
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2015/03/02/tpr2-calorimetry-of-hot-cat-performed-by-means-of-ir-camera-2/
TPR2 – Calorimetry of Hot-Cat performed by means of IR camera
--
Conclusions: The MFMP experimental
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Some recent experimental measurements by the Martin Fleischmann Memorial
Project (MFMP) highlighted a possible error in the Hot-Cat calorimetric
measurement; the calorimetric measurement we are referring to is described
15 matches
Mail list logo
