Interesting note from Quantum Heat/Hunt/MFMP/.
Quote: LockTherm LLC representatives did not say if they had seen excess
heat in these tests. they demonstrated a video where, with 5 atmospheres of
pressure put into a used tube, they could see light.
Does anyone have a citation for that video or
The LockTherm testing is certainly interesting, but it is not clear to me
that it has any advantage over Parkhomov. I have seen no additional
videos, nor have I heard that they achieved excess heat.
An interesting phase of this whole Parkhomov/Rossi fuel is what is
happening in the 700-1100ºC
Dear Friends,
Slow weekstart- scarce LENR-info here till this hour:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/why-wireless-hot-cat-experiment-could.html
usually I publish me issue before dinner and then it catalyses
publications and news. This week we need good news.
Start please breeding the
Well, this could be true, but we have no evidence that it was an advantage
since there has been no report of XH from LockTherm. Better to compare
experiments that show XH, and that is a really small group.
It would be interesting to have an SEM of their heated pill. Since they
appear to be a
Bob,
One advantage not mentioned was on geometry, nature opposes
construction of Casimir geometry in bulk powders and skeletal cats… this method
is far easier than leaching aluminum out of a nickel alloy or counting on
stiction forces to maintain the powder in bulk form .. It
From: Bob Higgins
*
* The LockTherm testing is certainly interesting, but it is not clear to
me that it has any advantage over Parkhomov.
Well, the one HUGE advantage is that they are able to seal the ceramic with a
compression fitting and are therefore able to both relieve
Yes, this is an advantage, and it is one that MFMP has already
demonstrated. I guess I should have said that it has no clear advantage
over MFMP.
My experiments going forward should allow the pressure to be measured in
the small Parkhomov-size volume, do the experiment in a non-boiling
Way don't you use a tungsten pipe. It holds hydrogen about a thousand time
better than stainless steel and it would explode if it is thick enough.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, this is an advantage, and it is one that MFMP has already
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
At temps of 900-1000ºC, the LiH is reported to dissociate. However, high
ambient H2 pressure may keep the LiH from dissociating until higher
temperatures. I think the high temperature molten LiH + Al in contact with
9 matches
Mail list logo
