Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Can someone please describe how they are measuring output power?
Where is the evidence of gain?
It is basically a temperature comparison, which is not the best method, but
the temperature difference is large. Look at the full sized slides here:
From: Jed Rothwell
Can someone please describe how they are measuring output power? Where is the
evidence of gain?
* It is basically a temperature comparison, which is not the best method,
but the temperature difference is large.
“Not the best method”? Without proper calibration, this
Type B thermocouples are expensive; even for fine wire, short, uninsulated
couples, because they are made from platinum. They may be 10x more
expensive than type-K and extension wires are just as expensive.
Additionally the signal level is smaller with type-B which means more noise
in the
I was starting to understand what is the moon when they pulled the ladder...
2015-05-30 18:07 GMT+02:00 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
Dear Alain,
I have already noticed your creative metaphor.
I was already here downstairs at the Sputnik Event.
Peter
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:43 PM,
Fran,
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roarty@lmco
.com wrote:
Alberto, the series current is constant thru both but the loaded reactor
heating coil becomes shunted by the plasma environment . E^2/R is going to
be different and the power distribution will be
a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
Beats me why they don't use type S or type B thermocouples that are common
in the glass industry.
That probably would be better. You should suggest it to Jiang. (His e-mail
in the slides. He is a good guy.)
The K-type thermocouple maxed out.
They
The MFMP data is really compelling. As the temperature rises; as the
internal pressure drops, the difference between the fueled cell and the
control gets wider.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/15ODbN9Oq6Pjyp9A61hdX0-fBJIXBBKMk7Ei06PzTc-Q/htmlview?sle=true#gid=1291075296
Craig
On Sat,
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a successful reproduction of a test yesterday by MFMP.
Here are spreadsheets showing the MFMP results from May 28, 2015:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15ODbN9Oq6Pjyp9A61hdX0-fBJIXBBKMk7Ei06PzTc-Q/htmlview?sle=true#
Oops. I should have said:
Evidence for excess heat is found because T2 is much hotter than T1. *T1 is
touching the resistance heater*, which should be the hottest place in the
system.
Heat escapes by various paths, but no matter how complicated those paths
are, I am pretty sure that with no
I skimmed through it, one thing that struck me was that they hit 1372°C for
10 minutes. I have serious doubts that their stainless steel vessel could
have survived such a temperature (barely bellow melting) - which makes me
suspicious of an error somewhere, this is above where k-type
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Ø JR: 405 deg C is a huge difference.
Yes, but it is proof of nothing other than an inverted temperature
profile.
Assuming the temperature difference is real, and not an instrument
artifact, it is proof that a great deal of heat originated from
MFMP is performing a very interesting live experiment now. The first that I
know of in LENR that test for excess heat with a null hypothesis: they are
running a loaded reactor in series with a empty reactor and the loaded
reactor is tens of degrees Celsius hotter than the empty one (very good
See:
“New Result of Anomalous Heat Production in Hydrogen-loaded Metals at High
Temperature” New Report by Songsheng Jiang of the China Institute of Atomic
Energy (CIAE)
There is a successful reproduction of a test yesterday by MFMP.
The slides are here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/267085905/New-Result-on-Anomalous-Heat-Production-in-Hydrogen-loaded
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a successful reproduction of a test yesterday by MFMP.
Yes. Jiang's test was on May 4 at the China Institute of Atomic
Alberto, the series current is constant thru both but the loaded reactor
heating coil becomes shunted by the plasma environment . E^2/R is going to be
different and the power distribution will be different – I am sure they are
aware of this and they may be on to something but I have to disagree
Can someone please describe how they are measuring output power?
Where is the evidence of gain?
Did they leave out some of the text?
From: Jed Rothwell
The slides are here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/267085905/New-Result-on-Anomalous-Heat-Production-in-Hydrogen-loaded
Or two turning points, both in the good direction? See:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/05/good-news-from-china-and-very-hopefully.html
I know positive events/changes must come.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Beats me why they don't use type S or type B thermocouples that are
common in the glass industry.
Chinese Sputnik says bip bip bip
2015-05-30 16:17 GMT+02:00 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
Or two turning points, both in the good direction? See:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/05/good-news-from-china-and-very-hopefully.html
I know positive events/changes must come.
Peter
--
Dear Alain,
I have already noticed your creative metaphor.
I was already here downstairs at the Sputnik Event.
Peter
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chinese Sputnik says bip bip bip
2015-05-30 16:17 GMT+02:00 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
21 matches
Mail list logo
