[Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a new article about Brillouin: http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/BrillouinIE123.pdf My response: Godes' strategy makes no sense to me. It is a terrific waste of his time and his investors' money. I cannot imagine any reason why a person would build a 104 kW reactor at this

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Axil Axil
> > Jed says: > > 2. There are hundreds of corporations and probably hundreds of thousands > of engineers in the world who can do a better job at this than Godes. If he > would only demonstrate that the effect is real, these corporations and > experts would be lined up ready to do this job far

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Axil Axil
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/08/31/rossi-manufacturing-not-licensing-is-focus-for-e-cat/ Without air tight IP protection through patents, selling knowhow cannot be done. Rossi is locking down LENR IP. Unless Godes gets his own IP, he has nothing to sell. Will Rossi go to court to cut the legs

[Vo]:LENR WEEK PREVIEW AND INFO

2015-08-31 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/lenr-week-preview-and-info.html Please read it and not only for the sake of LENR Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

RE: [Vo]:Self- charging battery ADGEX

2015-08-31 Thread Jones Beene
From: ChemE Stewart Similar Item: Ø http://phys.org/news/2013-02-german-student-electromagnetic-harvester-recharge.html Yes – thanks for remembering this, Stewart, It appears that this effort will at least provide us with a baseline for determining how much benefit there is in

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil wrote: > “We are an engineering company. We are making equipment that companies > should be able to go out and produce things themselves. We don’t want to > produce things; it’s not what Brillouin is about. . . . > > > Jed, did you not understand the business

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Axil Axil
It seems to me that what you don;t want to do is design a reactor that produces tritium. Tritium production is a nonstarter in the reactor business. The NRC will shut down any reactor that produces tritium even in the smallest amounts. What is Godes thinking here? On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:04 PM,

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread David Roberson
He obviously wants to show that his reaction is nuclear by the tritium production. Let's hope that the amount generated is not going to be an issue for regulators. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Mon, Aug 31,

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Axil Axil
No reactor that produces any amount of tritium will ever be sold! On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:42 PM, David Roberson wrote: > He obviously wants to show that his reaction is nuclear by the tritium > production. Let's hope that the amount generated is not going to be an > issue

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil wrote: No reactor that produces any amount of tritium will ever be sold! > That may not be true. Tritium is used today in exit signs and wristwatches. In other words, government regulations already allow it in small amounts. As long as it can be shown that the

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread a.ashfield
Jed, not to mention that Tokamaks produce tritium by the liter.

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Axil Axil
FYI Rector shutdown due to radiation leakage. https://tlarremore.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/nuclear-event-reactor-shutdown-salem-nuclear-power-plant-new-jersey/t On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Axil Axil wrote: > > No reactor

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

2015-08-31 Thread Axil Axil
NRC nuclear inspections cost a lot, The reactor operators must give the NRC about 20 million a year for inspection. On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:50 PM, a.ashfield wrote: > Jed, not to mention that Tokamaks produce tritium by the liter. > >

Re: [Vo]:Self- charging battery ADGEX

2015-08-31 Thread ChemE Stewart
Another similar bracelet http://www.iewei.net/en/#HOME On Monday, August 31, 2015, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:* ChemE Stewart > > Similar Item: > > > > Ø > http://phys.org/news/2013-02-german-student-electromagnetic-harvester-recharge.html > > > > Yes – thanks for

[Vo]:Andrea Rossi Granted E-Cat Patent by US Patent Office !!

2015-08-31 Thread Kevin O'Malley
Andrea Rossi Granted E-Cat Patent by US Patent Office 0 Comments Edit

RE: [Vo]:Andrea Rossi Granted E-Cat Patent by US Patent Office !!

2015-08-31 Thread Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
I'm guessing the question most of us are asking at this point is whether an independent replication effort will be performed based on Rossi's latest patent filing information. Perhaps I'm mistaken on this point but I'm guessing an independent setup & test shouldn't be all that costly to do.

Re: [Vo]:Self- charging battery ADGEX

2015-08-31 Thread Ron Kita
I thought that I was getting power from a conductive Neo Magnet...then I turned off the flourescent light above meProof- No Voltage reading. Ron Kita, Chiralex On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > I've worked on EMI detection in paris. > > first

Re: [Vo]:Self- charging battery ADGEX

2015-08-31 Thread Alain Sepeda
I've worked on EMI detection in paris. first source of Em is 50Hz from house wiring (HV lines are negligible few meters away) because you are inside the loop, or at least nearby. second source is FM radio (very clear in paris, they saturated a 1M$ receptor who was fooled a funny way). TV is big

Re: [Vo]:Andrea Rossi Granted E-Cat Patent by US Patent Office !!

2015-08-31 Thread Jed Rothwell
Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: > > Perhaps I'm mistaken on this point but I'm guessing an independent setup & > test shouldn't be all that costly to do. > Not costly or difficult if you are a phosita! To paraphrase Dirty Harry: Ask yourself: Do I pheel like a

Re: [Vo]:Self- charging battery ADGEX

2015-08-31 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: Who within the Vort Collective would like to volunteer to keep a casual > watch on this development? If the invention is quirky, the claims outlandish and the inventor a little colorful, I'm

Re: [Vo]:Self- charging battery ADGEX

2015-08-31 Thread David Roberson
Does anyone have a diagram that shows the internal circuitry of this device? Why is it only expected to last for 5 years if the energy source is infinite? My suspicion is that it is battery backed up and the actual charging rate is extremely slow. This appears to be more of a toy than a

Re: [Vo]:Self- charging battery ADGEX

2015-08-31 Thread ChemE Stewart
Similar Item: http://phys.org/news/2013-02-german-student-electromagnetic-harvester-recharge.html If we are going to irradiate ourselves we might as well generate power while we are alive! On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:14 AM, David Roberson wrote: > Does anyone have a diagram