I think Axil has stumbled upon an explanation of the formation of Ni-62 (which
has been reported but with extreme doubt from many including some Vorts).
I have thought that the understanding of the extent of a coherent QM system
(entangled per Axil’s terms) is a key. And the tendency of
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
The physicists seem to be trodding down a wrong path without ever looking
> around to see if their original assumptions could have been wrong.
There does seem to be some hand-waiving in current subatomic physics, as
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/09/sep-13-2015-terni-meeting-preview-lenr.html
subjective, LENR focused preview
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
what was said in the report was ambiguous and is compatible with Bo Hoistad
"Rossi later intervened to switch off the dummy, and in the following
subsequent operations on the E-Cat: charge insertion, reactor startup,
reactor shutdown and powder charge extraction."
the idea he did the operation is
I say once again that it is impossible for anyone to build a ash particle
using Li5 ans Ni62 to look identically the same as a fuel particle that is
composed of Li7 and Ni58, Ni60 and Ni61.
This 100 micron ash particle had to have been produced by some exotoic LENR
nuclear process inside the Hot
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 12:14 PM, David Roberson wrote:
But, when I detect curve fitting instead of basic understanding of the
> underlying processes I get annoyed.
>
I think by "curve fitting" you might mean the ad hoc creation of an
explanation together with a dogmatic
Without supersymmetry, the standard model does not hold together.
supersymmetry will not be found at the LHC. Particle physics will demand a
bigger and more powerful proton smasher to find supersymmetry at a huge
waste of more money.
Background...
Supersymmetry (SUSY), a theory of particle
Eric, I hear what you are saying about the different interactions but that does
not help to explain exactly why that is so. My suspicion is that the behavior
is explained by creating new "forces, colors, and particles" that have
arbitrary interaction methods just to fit the measurements. I
From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com
* what was said in the report was ambiguous and is compatible with Bo
Hoistad
"Rossi later intervened to switch off the dummy, and in the following
subsequent operations on the E-Cat: charge insertion, reactor startup, reactor
shutdown and powder charge
"The only conceivable “intervention” for relatively simple tasks is obvious:
you do them.Rossi himself physically performed the loading and unloading."
Intervention, intervening, in corporate context simply mean coming in
mission to do something, to watch something...
watching is intervening.
This "curve fitting" issue is related to the coupling constant between the
electromagnetic force and the weak force. Glashow just pulled this number
out of the air to make the electroweak theory work at low energies. The
Higgs field was invented to make the electoweak theory work at high
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0710.5177.pdf
Speeding-up Thorium decay
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.5391.pdf
Remarks on the cavitation of Thorium-228
I doubt that Jed has anything by Fabio Cardone in his library.
In the recent past the Kiplinger newsletter has mentioned the fact that there
are renewed efforts underway in researching & developing nuclear power from
Thorium decay. It's my understanding that many decades ago the US lost interest
in developing Thorium-based energy when it became clear to
This paper explains how a collapsing cavitation bubble produces Surface
Pasmon Polaritons, the same mechanism that produces LENR reactions in the
Ni/H reactor.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/AminiFthestudyof.pdf
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 8:48 PM, wrote:
> If this is true
This experiment did not produce neutrons or gamma radiation. These
characteristics are common attributes of Cold Fusion and can be used to
identify an experiment as LENR that deals with nuclear changes.
The experimenters would loss their status if they said that the cause of
this reaction was
http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2663#
Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement
Orthodox science has just come up with a new type of entanglement to
explain how black holes can radiate Hawking radiation.
Many different types of particles/atoms can all be entangled by a
multi-party
Well said Dave. And as you point out, the continuous to 0 aspect of Maxwell’s
theory does not explain quantized amounts of angular momentum associated with
electrons and other charged particles.
Bob Cook
From: David Roberson
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 10:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
If this is true it may support the theories by Hagelstein.
The Th
nucleus picking up vibration quanta until its emits alpha or brakes with
cold fission.
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:29:33 -0400, Axil Axil wrote:
This experiment did not produce neutrons or gamma radiation. These
characteristics
18 matches
Mail list logo