From: ChemE Stewart
* OOPS DEFAULT
*
http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2015/12/15/nrg-ivanpah-faces-chance-of-default-PGE-contract
Just to avoid any wrong implications, Stewart - any default would be a
bookkeeping adjustment for Google’s tax purposes. Solar is growing rapidly in
Cal. and
There is a recently funded (ARPA-E) technology which could push solar into
higher demand by lowering cost per kW. It is a “brilliant” idea, so to speak.
There are two primary methods for using sunlight: direct conversion to
electricity using photovoltaics, or focusing sunlight onto a fluid that
I know very little about calorimetry. When I see reports along the lines
of "using isoperibolic calorimetry, we saw 200 J of excess heat," etc., I
think to myself "perhaps there were 200 J of excess heat. I wouldn't know
for sure."
Recently there has been an analysis purporting to show that
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/12/dec-30-2015-my-wish-2016-year-of-lenr.html
self explanatory, with a bit of music
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Mirrors last a long time in the desert? With wind and sand blowing? 375,000
motors turning? Taxpayers paid $1.6B for this plant, Google is a minority.
BTW this plant burns natural gas...
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:03:42 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Arizona State U is developing a hybrid solar energy system that modifies the
>single axis CSP trough design, converting the mirrored trough with solar
>cells that collect direct rays while reflecting the rest of
Looking at the super bright incandescence of the tower of the CSP station at
Ivanpah (makes a nice screensaver) also brings to mind another possible hybrid…
plasmonics.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.6949
“Plasmonic materials for energy: from physics to applications” by Svetlana
Boriskina of MIT.
ChemE Stewart wrote:
Mirrors last a long time in the desert? With wind and sand blowing?
They last for a remarkably long time. Many of the SEGS parabolic mirror
generators in the Mojave desert have been working since the late 1980s and
they are still in good condition.
The
I wrote:
> The taxpayers will get their money back eventually. The power companies
> are not going to stop buying electricity from this installation. They may
> renegotiate the price . . .
>
Source:
I think I read this at Renewable Energy World, but I cannot find the
article. Anyway, that is
Hi Jed. Just recommended your link and tweeted it elsewhere.
BTW, just 17 thumbs up? Not even a Readers' Pick or NYT Pick? :( What a
shame.
It would appear that you need 50-60 more thumbups before it will be a
readers' pick.
On 25 December 2015 at 18:25, Jed Rothwell
Esa Ruoho wrote:
Hi Jed. Just recommended your link and tweeted it elsewhere.
>
Thanks!
> BTW, just 17 thumbs up? Not even a Readers' Pick or NYT Pick? :( What a
> shame.
>
It is listed in the Reader's Picks, but it is way down the list, because it
only got 17 votes. The
11 matches
Mail list logo