I asked the supplier that specific question. If we wanted to run our
experiment with an enrichment of 62Ni, would it be cheaper to buy the
lesser enriched Ni or buy a smaller amount of 96% and dilute it. The
answer came back plain and simple - the cheapest is to buy the smaller
amount of 96% and
From: Bob Higgins
> MFMP intends to find out by purchasing some 96% enriched 62Ni to run in a
> Parkhomov-like reactor. The cost to purchase 96% enriched 62Ni is $11.30/mg
> (milligram)…
Bob – the thought just occurred, assuming that 62Ni is the only active isotope
… and the others are
I wrote:
> Assuming the reactor is connected to some sort of radiator or ventilation
> system like any other space heater, then any licensed HVAC engineer who
> works with large furnaces could do this test.
>
I mean a test to confirm the heat. Many other important tests must be done
with a cold
LENR is breaking down the protons and neutrons in the nucleus. This
produces electrons and heat as the final product.
Breaking down means causing the proton and neutron to decay to mesons.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:39 PM, H LV wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> The general expectation
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
>
> Rossi is known to have purchased 62Ni a few years back from an isotope
> producer. Also, another source claims to have provided some amount of 62Ni
> to Rossi. So we know that Rossi obtained some 62Ni. This does
Hi Matt,
The general expectation among Rossi supporters is that he is going to
supply the world with a super fuel. Among his detractors the general
expectation is that he is engaged in fraud. However,
I take
Rossi
's ambiguous remarks as
hint
to his supporters that
their
expectations
I think Peter posted this message here and at CMNS. Anyway, here is a
response.
Peter quoted someone (not sure who):
"Any report from Rossi will be worthless unless it includes the names of
the claimed independent referee which Rossi refers to as "ERV". If this
person is an unknown, without
Bob Higgins--
I had the same thoughts, however, I thought it may have to do with engineering
a robust Ni nano particle that would not be damaged so as to shutdown the
reaction happening because of the Ni lattice parameters.
Bob Cook
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:18
RE: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:I have
always assumed that the isotopic concentrations were due to various
differential parameters, including magnetic field strengths, during their
generation. It is generally assumed that supernovae product the display of
The Lugano report states that the ~1g of fuel was poured into the reactor.
However, I am told that when the researchers were retrieving a sample of
ash, it was firmly attached to the tube walls. The reactor had to be
broken open (maybe Rossi did this for them) and the ash sample was scraped
off
From: Bob Cook
*
* What on earth make Ni-62 a good catalyst?. It would nice to at least
to have a suggested catalytic mechanism… it is a singularity with the highest
binding potential energy per nucleon of any nucleons. That means it’s stable.
Yes, a lot of thought has gone
RE: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:Eric and Bob
Higgins comments comments on tests regarding the issue of Ni-62 can be found at
the following Vortex-l thread: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:33:07 –0700
Bob Cook
From: Bob Cook
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:59 AM
To:
RE: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:What on
earth make Ni-62 a good catalyst?. It would nice to at least to have a
suggested catalytic mechanism.
As Jones notes, it is a singularity with the highest binding potential energy
per nucleon of any nucleons. That
NASA's Pink X-15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-dtqDirCS0
Harry
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/02/feb-22-2016-lenr-how-competent-must-be.html
and a rumor of a surprise... developing
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
The Lugano reactor did not produce nickel-62 as ash, which is what AR wants
> the world to believe. The nearly pure isotope was there from the start.
What you say may be true. Bob Higgins's interpretation of the strange
I don't get it. Dump the 1 MW of heat energy into an Olympic sized
swimming pool and in a few days it would be uncomfortably hot.. in 9
days the whole pool would be boiling. If he used diesel for the input
energy, the test would be conclusive in days. What are they doing for
the other 11 months?
From: Teslaalset
* Rossi does not have any obligations to anyone except probably Darden
because he invested in his technology development. He is an entrepreneur and
not somebody who is paid by society… Give Rossi a bit more credit on what he
shares and what he doesn’t share. From his
Teslaalset wrote:
Rossi does not have any obligations to anyone except probably Darden
> because he invested in his technology development. He is an entrepreneur
> and not somebody who is payed by society. What he tells us and what he
> doesn’t tell us is up to him.
Rossi does not have any obligations to anyone except probably Darden
because he invested in his technology development. He is an entrepreneur
and not somebody who is payed by society. What he tells us and what he
doesn’t tell us is up to him.
The field he is trying to explore is unique and
My guess is that this test is to determine if the customer is going to convert
an entire factory boilers to this unproven technology. Probably to decide
whether to make a $50,000,000 investment or more.
Probably doesn't care how it works. :-)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
21 matches
Mail list logo