The only details that I can surmise from this label is that it probably came
from “Ruskhim” which from the web is/was a seller of reagents, chemical, raw
materials and lab gear … and that the sales date was 1990. And at least the
seller considered it to be 99.90 % nickel.
This means
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
We know that the ERV test director is a person with long years of
> experience in the nuclear industry.
>
Do you have a link to more information about this?
Eric
Jed--
Your understanding of how radiation is regulated is not entirely correct. NRC
has cognizance over certain radioactive materials and, hence, the safety
associated with handling those materials. Many radioactive materials are not
controlled by NRC. For example, materials activated by
Don't know if this will come through, but it is small... Here is the image
of the label unwrapped from the jar:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Okay, without the noise:
>
> http://oi66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.jpg
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM,
Okay, without the noise:
http://oi66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.jpg
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> That was confusing. Try this:
>
> http://tinypic.com/r/b7bc5k/9
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> Here's
That was confusing. Try this:
http://tinypic.com/r/b7bc5k/9
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Here's a piccy of the label:
>
> http://tinypic.com?ref=b7bc5k; target="_blank">http://i66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.png; border="0" alt="Image and video
> hosting
I wrote:
> If there is radiation obviously it will need many more years to establish
> the exact nature of the radiation, to develop a theory, and to have the
> theory checked and accepted by the majority of physicists so that we can be
> sure the radiation is controlled or fully prevented in a
Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi knows that his reactor can produce radiation. He has taken steps to
> reduce of eliminate that radiation.
>
Yes. I know. Assuming he is right about that, then what you said previously
makes no sense. You said: "Rossi would have no way to predict that
Rossi knows that his reactor can produce radiation. He has taken steps to
reduce of eliminate that radiation.
Your the person who said that Rossi's reactor needed to be tested for years
to see if it produced radiation. The FDA has product rules for radiation
production produced over a time
The possibility of really-cold cold-fusion pops up from time to time. The J-T
effect would require the temperature of liquid nitrogen.
The basis of the idea is that if most the gain occurs via radiation that
escapes the reactor (in particular – muons) then the reactor can be kept at
Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi would have no way to predict that his technology is radiation free.
> This is his reason for the F9 response in terms of the ERV test. If any
> radiation is seen coming out of the X-Cat, that would put Rossi in a very
> difficult spot with NRC and FDA
It seems to me if the measure of success is the production of excess heat
that Rossi would surly know how the ERV yearlong test went. But the
criteria for successfully passing the 1 year test may not be COP but the
production of ionizing radiation or the lack of it. Rossi has spent many
years in
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-27-2016-lenrs-past-can-help-its.html
It was not easy but I succeed to get info and to compose a blog issue
today too.
all the best to you, friends!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
13 matches
Mail list logo