Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: > Contrary to Jed's comments, I expect there will be commercial plants > running by the time this reaches court. > If that happens, Rossi will lose. He will have to provide I.H. with the IP as originally agreed. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Yes, but sadly people are jumping the gun in interpreting this. Seems like probably just something that they have to do should the judge rule it will go to trial. But, I don't know that either. Best to wait to hear from the judge. On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:34 PM Jones Beene

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Sorry but this document is not a ruling on the motion to dismiss. If there has been such an ruling, where is it? It is doubtful that the motion to dismiss has been heard, since it was only filed recently. This document does not imply that the motion has been heard. -Original

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Ooops I made a Freudian slip. I thought the trial would probably be delayed and typed 2018 instead of 2017

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

The motion to dismiss has been rejected. Rossi v. Darden will go to a trial by jury starting on Sept 18th 2018 http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0020.1.pdf Contrary to Jed's comments, I expect there will be commercial

[Vo]:LENR the shock of the present, the brightness of the future

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/06/jun-30-2016-shock-of-present-and.html Issue dedicated to the memory of Alvin Toffler. Today no news, no publications (till now) so I decide no dispute! But tomorrow everything will continue. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania