[Vo]:A super nickel powder LENR catalyst.

Another Rossi secret revealed as follows: google.com/patents/US9023754 Nano-skeletal catalyst US 9023754 B2 google.com/url?sa=t=j=…hw=bv.129759880,d.eWE A NEW FAMILY OF NICKEL POWDER FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING. APPLICATIONS This super nano nickel powder is Rossi's powder as shown in the

RE: [Vo]:Johnson Matthey, Plc

One perplexing thing about this palladium alloy discussion over the years is that the answer could be hiding in plain sight. Johnson-Matthey applied for a patent in England in 1989 within months of the SLC announcement -- but then withdrew the application without explanation a few years

RE: [Vo]:Johnson Matthey, Plc

From: Terry Blanton Every decade or so, I ask if anyone knows the secret to the Johnson Matthey metals used by F Looks like you are a bit ahead of schedule this time: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg34410.html

Re: [Vo]:Johnson Matthey, Plc

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: Up until now, I have been willing to be open minded about AR. But, he > chose to use the name "Johnson Matthew" to imply that they were the same > firm that provided the rods used by Fleischmann and Pons: > Despite the

Re: [Vo]:Johnson Matthey, Plc

The fact Rossi misspelled in his fraud the name "Matthey" with "Matthew" JM company letterhead, highlight the fraud even more. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > Up until now, I have been willing to be open minded about AR. But, he > chose to use the

Re: [Vo]:Johnson Matthey, Plc

Every decade or so, I ask if anyone knows the secret to the Johnson Matthey metals used by F I am told that JM knows; but, won't tell. I once thought it involved the number of folds and presses done to the metal. . . like Damascus Steel. This would contribute to the number of cracks in the

[Vo]:Johnson Matthey, Plc

Up until now, I have been willing to be open minded about AR. But, he chose to use the name "Johnson Matthew" to imply that they were the same firm that provided the rods used by Fleischmann and Pons: http://www.technology.matthey.com/article/34/3/136-141/ I am a difficult person to convince of

Re: [Vo]:Neuglu confirmed

The Proton Radius Problem and the Muon. http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/08/researchers-orbit-a-muon-around-an-atom-confirm-physics-is-broken/ Very interesting article on Ars Technica with possible far-reaching implications for LENR researchers. These discrepancies from standard model

Re: [Vo]:Do not burn the bridge to LENR technology!

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-17-2016-will- > iccf20-be-not-more.html > > > and will ICCF20 be a turning point showing there si no more turning > back to LENR's seemingly insoluble problems? > 'Cold

[Vo]:Do not burn the bridge to LENR technology!

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-17-2016-will-iccf20-be-not-more.html and will ICCF20 be a turning point showing there si no more turning back to LENR's seemingly insoluble problems? Best wishes, Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Or IH's! 2016-08-17 15:23 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene : > Rossi’s attorney arises >

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Yes, that's a problem. So much that IH issued a patent with one of their people. 2016-08-17 12:09 GMT-03:00 Giovanni Santostasi : > > How in the right mind IH could offer to find a customer if the plant > didn't work? > >

RE: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

If you guys are right… there is another looming problem which could end this case before it gets underway. No one seems to have mentioned this but a serious difficulty for Rossi’s attorney arises once he is informed or realizes that his client has been dishonest in the complaint – such as

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

You have to check the calculations Allan Fletcher and I did. 2016-08-17 11:43 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell : > > > It is not big enough for 1 MW, or even 100 kW. > > >

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > IH accusation are so precise both in context and timing that it should > easy to show they are full of shit. > Yes. For example, if Mr. Bass actually exists they can have him testify. But they do not even need to rebut the specific

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Article: Ocean Waves Could Supply the World’s Power and Drinking Water

And probably help with coastal erosion (taking away some of the energy of the waves before they heat the shore) that is a big problem for the Gulf Coast states. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jack Cole wrote: > >> A new kind of

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

*Daniel:Yes, let's wait for the judgment. Though I think JM was a company only made to test the product, since IH would not offer one to Rossi test. So, I don't think they are working anymore.* Daniel, or you not familiar with the entire story or you are very selective with your memory. When

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Daniel, It doesn't work in that way. You are coming up with conspiracy theory, after conspiracy theory. Again Occam Razor. One theory explains everything about Rossi, your way to explain away IH evidence is to say they are fabricating business cards, they are not giving away all the emails

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Daniel Rocha wrote: There's a vent on google maps. > It is not big enough for 1 MW, or even 100 kW. > And, IH not wanting a test? That's characterizing them as too much of > imbeciles, which I don't believe. > No one said they did not want a test. They did not ask for

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Article: Ocean Waves Could Supply the World’s Power and Drinking Water

Jack Cole wrote: > A new kind of renewable energy technology in use off Australia’s coast > converts the relentless movement of the ocean’s waves into a virtually > endless supply of electricity. > The Gulf Stream off of the U.S. cost would be another tremendous source of

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

There's a vent on google maps. And, IH not wanting a test? That's characterizing them as too much of imbeciles, which I don't believe. 2016-08-17 11:12 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell : > As you see from the photos and other evidence, there are no vents or > coolers. There were

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Daniel Rocha wrote: Yes, let's wait for the judgment. Though I think JM was a company only made > to test the product, since IH would not offer one to Rossi test. > It was never part of the agreement that a company should test the product. That was Rossi's idea. JM did

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Yes, let's wait for the judgment. Though I think JM was a company only made to test the product, since IH would not offer one to Rossi test. So, I don't think they are working anymore. 2016-08-17 10:51 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell : > Exactly. Suppose Bass is a real person. J.M.

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

This is what the lawyers are being paid off. To make filthy rich people look like Little Red Riding Hood and Rossi, the Wolf. Regarding the emails, are you sure it's all in there? Were the servers containing the emails apprehended? 2016-08-17 10:17 GMT-03:00 Giovanni Santostasi

[Vo]:Article: Ocean Waves Could Supply the World’s Power and Drinking Water

A new kind of renewable energy technology in use off Australia’s coast converts the relentless movement of the ocean’s waves into a virtually endless supply of electricity. “Wave energy’s been … http://flip.it/BXxDCF Sent via Flipboard , your personal magazine. Get it for

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Eric Walker wrote: > If IH have knowingly entered a fake business card as an exhibit before a > US federal court, and this is shown to be the case, it will be very bad > news for them, and perhaps for Jones Day if they also knew. It would be a > horrible legal

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

As we mentioned before the only IH fault that can be deduced from the legal papers from both sides (a some common sense) is that IH was too naive and they didnt do enough due diligence (maybe enough for normal type of business but not enough for what was required in dealing with Rossi). While