In reply to Nigel Dyer's message of Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:02:01 +:
Hi,
Absorption would be energy dependent, but depends on the path taken. If the
source were highly localized, then the path between source and detector would be
the same for all photons. Would that yield one of the 1/f factors
Read this "A radio interview with Sergio Focardi, the father of “Ni-H
Cold-Fusion".
https://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/04/sergio-focardi-father-of-ni-h-cold.html
So contrary to what Jones & Brian write, Ross's reactors worked from the early
days. They both did lots of experiments and Foracdi
Re: the possibility that new discoveries will turn up a metamaterial which can
reacts with neutrinos to a much greater extent than expected could be bolstered
by evidence from cosmology presented below. There are many lose ends, however.
Could UDH be used in two ways – both as the target for
Ultra dense hydrogen (UDH) may not be a primary source for muon production.
The Surface Plasmon Polariton may be the primary source of proton
annihilation. The UDH by be a helpful host that provides a secondary
support structure for the viability and maintenance of the SPPs. The SPP
can use other
It is worth repeating that in Holmlid’s article cited by Axil, we find several
problems with his claim of copious muon production (aside from the massive
transfer of energy which becomes undetectable).
Holmlid: “The muons formed do not decay appreciably within the flight distances
used here.
I think there is every possibility that what is measured is a secondary,
Bremstallung like effect.
One other factor is that whatever is being measured is outside the
alumina and steel container of the active ingredients of the glow
stick. If the gamma was generated from the 'active
6 matches
Mail list logo
