Bob a short but not quite correct answer woold be, Normally we start with
Planck's constant a formulate quantum mechanics. Planck's constant is not
classical. One of the things that come out of this analysis would be the
classical radius of the electron.
Now lets say that the classical
Thank you Bob. The quote did not text properly upon the cut and past but the
message was there. Normally the classical realm is considered to be a subset
of the quantum realm. I discovered this thing called a quantum of capacitacnce
in about 1995. It a mimimun of stray capacitance. It is
To further expalin the crux of your comment, including the pertinent text of
your book would be helpful. I have no clue as to understanding your comment.
Bob Cook
From: Frank Znidarsic
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 1:23:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject:
Jones—
You are missing the subtle issue that the link to the IEC site identified 25kw
not 25kwh of energy storage. They do not know the difference between power and
energy. I think that was the crux of Terry’s remark.
Bob Cook
From: Jones
Is it scam? I don't know, but I don't think it is the duty of an observer
to explain away such an incongrous statement when the statement is made by
someone who purports to be knowledgeable.
Harry
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:21 PM Jones Beene wrote:
> This machine is surely an enigma but is it
This author suggests thatthat an elastic discontinuity of radius 2rp appears as
oneeffect of a minimum of stray electrical capacitance. This minimum of
capacitance is a geometricconstraint. The quantum realm appears,within a
subset of Newtonian mechanics, as a universal effect of
This machine is surely an enigma but is it a scam? It does not seem to be.
There is a possibility that the unit presently will function more as a UPS than
a primary source of electrical power. Otherwise it makes no economic sense...
other than being a scientific curiosity supplying "free
Why I Don’t “Believe” in “Science”
Science isn't about "belief." It's about facts, evidence, theories,
experiments.
by ROBERT TRACINSKI MARCH 26, 2019
https://thebulwark.com/why-i-dont-believe-in-science/
begin quote
<>
end quote
:-D
"two tens for a five"
https://youtu.be/f7pMYHn-1yA
Harry
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 8:06 PM Terry Blanton
> 40 *kw* of mechanical *energy*
>>
>
> uh-huh. They sure know what they are talking about.
>
Nigel Dyer wrote: Last week I was made aware of a 1982 patent taken out by
Johann Grander on a magnetic motor. The text only appears to be available in
German so I spent an hour or so with Google translate converting it to English.
... That would be this guy?
The link to the Army patent has no paratical application identified that I
could find.
Does anyone know about how the patented device is configured in the IEC engine?
Is the inference from all this that IEC device gets energy from some other
potential energy source?
For example, high tension
Last week I was made aware of a 1982 petent taken out by Johann Grander
on a magnetic motor. The text only appears to be available in German so
I spent an hour or so with Google translate converting it to English.
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1982003300A1/it
Nigel
On 27/03/2019
Apparently, the favored explanation given by investors in IEC is that the
inventor came up with a “monopole” permanent magnet (most likely a
pseudo-monopole).
The following older patent assigned to the US Army, is the Leupold patent,
which describes a permanent composite magnet in which
13 matches
Mail list logo
