Re: [Vo]:Re: merry Christmas

2020-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
JonesBeene wrote: > It is not clear if this category (~3 percent) is anything more than a > passing phenomenon > Other sources say the problems went away in one day or less. There have been no reports of longer-term problems. Other vaccines have stronger, more common effects, yet they are

Re: [Vo]:Re: merry Christmas

2020-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Look at CDC presentation slide 6** column explained below: > > > https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf > > 3% were no longer able to work afterwards... > Only for one day. Such reactions are common with many

RE: [Vo]:Re: merry Christmas

2020-12-22 Thread JonesBeene
Jürg “no longer able to work” could be misleading - since it implies a long term problem. It is not clear if this category (~3 percent) is anything more than a passing phenomenon – except for the few cases with extreme allergic reaction, of course. Recipients should be screened for history

Re: [Vo]:Re: merry Christmas

2020-12-22 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Not so happy Christmas for some... Pfizer vaccine seems to be high risk! Look at CDC presentation slide 6** column explained below: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf 3% were no longer able to work afterwards... Effectively