Time is absolute In quantum mechanics like it is in Newtonian mechanics.
However, since Newtonian mechanics does not allow for non-locality, it
could be that
the Newtonian sense of absolute time (N-Time) differs subtley from the
Quantum Mechanical sense of absolute time (Q-Time).
Perhaps the
"There's still a good bit of unfinished business with certain
18th-century breakthroughs that've languished.."
That is correct. Physics students are misinformed by the physics
establishment about physics history, especially missing out most of
stuff in 18th century.
-- Original
> So progression from 18th century theory of Boscovich to modern physics
Fascinating, i was unaware of Boscovich's contributions, great
first-principle reasoning though..
There's still a good bit of unfinished business with certain 18th-century
breakthroughs that've languished, but don't get me
Andrew
Just one thing:
I assume that you mean the atom (including the bound electron) is
neutral. If you mean that the bound electron (in its interaction with
the nuclear Coulomb field) is uncharged EM field only, then this would
be one of our incompatible assumptions. However, I am
Harry
I think of it as precursor to Bohm's pilot wave theory - particles
influenced by waves.
Boscovich's theory is particles influenced by fields; and a disturbance
in a field would be a wave.
-- Original Message --
From: "H LV"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, 29 Apr, 22 At
in add: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/schr.html
IE. equivalent, not conflicting..
> here is an example
> Absorption and Stimulated Emission by a Thin Slab Obeying the Lorentz
> Oscillator Model
It's a quantitative formulation from classical first principles, sans
Schrodinger.. whereas the wave equation approximates the time
evolution of the wavefunction; you could describe a
Did Boscovich subscribe to a wave or a particle view of light?
I wonder if electrons are "elementary points" and protons are "first order
particles" in Boscosvich's scheme.
https://youtu.be/w1vi0yk7BvU?t=248
harry
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:28 AM ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
> Also
>
> (i) Boscovich
Also
(i) Boscovich theory led to Quantum theory ->
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1vi0yk7BvU
(ii) Einstein working from Boscovich theory ->
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2197/1/012002/meta
So progression from 18th century theory of Boscovich to modern physics
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:44 PM Vibrator ! wrote:
> > I have been doing more reading about the history of stimulated
> > emission. Einstein formally introduced a quantum version of the concept
> in
> > 1917.
> > Therefore you might think that it is only possible in a quantum
> theoretical
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
