It gets more interesting by the day, does it not?
So lets see, If I place a picture of the readings on my TriField meter and
my Ham RF field strength meter what a large can of worms that will open up.
May I guess?
You have it positioned in a dead spot of the lab, doe a test over every
square
Horace, Michael, etc.
None of you deserve to see anything.
You all cry about this measurement and that AND I specifically asked in
response to guru Michaels posting, propose or present the measurement
methodology you will accept.
Guess what all were silent except for WB whom I took to think it
Stephen;
I was told to look at your post as it was insured I would want to respond.
But I am not returning to the list(s)until I finish documentation that I
will present at a later time. It makes no sense to have this dialog with
hundreds of people that are talking only from past or similar
This is quite interesting, a Tesla coil (of which I know very little about)
is being compared to a small radio antenna loop stick. A loop stick with
that has a coil on it that if you pulled more than 100mA through it most
likely would go up in smoke. (No I have not tried it) This baby little coil
Thanks for asking the question, this is one I have no answer for and the
following are some of the reasons.
1) I'm retired, not rich but comfortable.
2) I'm at an age where on the tables each day is great, although in good
health, what ever that means.
3) Would not be around long enough to enjoy
it).
Hey R.C. can you forward the directions to the Dime Box? I need a shot or to
now
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:37 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cold Electricity
EnergyLab wrote
Jones is right, I was being 'cute' in a mocking way and I apologize to the
professionals out there. My excuse is I just am totally burned out with the
feed back, its like we have all become rhetoric and only live in our minds.
I fell pain at the loss of experimentation for the sake of
For the vorts, here is a bit of information that at this time means nothing
to me, yet just may click with one of you.
In my video #7 the LEDS are in series across the rectifiers. One LED each
circuit glows very dim, almost can not see in lab light. Two LEDS (in
series) are brighter, keep adding
Terry
It is grounded, but the meaning of 'Properly' is open to interpretation.
If I myself were to question grounding I would have to go back to my early
days in radio. I had an FM site in an old Nike underground bunker. This
bunker had 2x2 brass buss bars running crisscross through. The bars
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New CE5 Video
On 10/16/07, EnergyLab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what would you call a proper ground?
A low enough resistance to earth
: [Vo]:Re: CE4
Ron,
I have a suggestion.
See if the air temperature affects the brightness of the light.
Harry
On 12/10/2007 2:21 PM, EnergyLab wrote:
Hey if I can use 100 different addresses for the same fee, why not? :-)
Boy I really hate to give those figures, I have enough trouble from
Anybody happen to know what it takes to drive one of those magical blue
or white LEDs to reasonable brightness? (My knowledge is all pretty
outdated -- with 2V p-p the old red/green/yellow LEDs I'm familiar with
probably wouldn't light in that rig, even hooked to a perfect voltage
source; they
I do not plan on posting this info anywhere else except my web site, but for
those that have interest I have listed here some links to scope pictures and
a basic circuit diagram. Values of the actual circuit shown in the video
will be on my site soon.
-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:CE4
Thanks much -- this is certainly a fascinating circuit.
I didn't realize you were the author when Jones posted the link to part
4 of the video.
EnergyLab
]:CE4
Thanks much -- this is certainly a fascinating circuit.
I didn't realize you were the author when Jones posted the link to part
4 of the video.
EnergyLab wrote:
I do not plan on posting this info anywhere else except my web site, but
for
those that have interest I have listed here some
I see on the various groups a lot of people working with the so called pulse
motors. In a majority of them they use a coil and a bridge rectifier to
recover energy, my question to anyone that is working with such a motor is
to try a little different configuration on that pickup coil.
Use a full
to prove this as a battery would not be needed at all.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pulse Motor Builders
--- EnergyLab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but leave one end
A university art teacher? so does he have a good slop to the concrete floor
and kitchen table not level.
If you can build from wood and get it to work then the whole science
community would look like BIG fools.
I for the moment think this may be another Joe Cell?
Yesterday I ran across a new article where the New York Times wanted public
submissions on the subject; 'What would I do if I were a terrorist'. They
stated that the government needed all the help it could get and that with
public input, maybe something would be exposed that the feds had not yet
Lets see, where I live I consume 63kw/24hrs for 280 days of the year.
So under ideal conditions with tracking arrays I would only need 126kw array
to meet my daily need? (Night time remember!)
But, even with tracking my best guess recovery is not 1kw/m2 but 650w/m2,
goosh that is more than my
21 matches
Mail list logo
