thomas malloy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
I think you missed my point. If you don't want something public then
don't make it so yourself.
Actually it appears you did miss something. If you are so concerned
analyzing and logging your every occurring thought,
emotion, and action in extreme detail. One day you will awaken and see your
true self. To Truth Logic!!! :-)))
Kind Regards,
Paul Lowrance
William Beaty wrote:
Anyone can fall into uncivil behavior during a heated debate. A civilized
person
OrionWorks wrote:
[snip]
You have called the Vortex participants You people..., that we
...can't get past [our] emotions, that we ...continue to kill each
other...
Thanks for pointing that out. To be more accurate, this statement can't get
past emotions is referring to present tense. Sorry
allows themselves to be consumed by
such behaviors.
My LOL in I can educate (LOL) was between Horace and I. Horace gets it. It
appears you have no clue what the LOL truly meant in this case. My LOL was a
reflection of a sentence Horace has repeatedly posted recently.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
on several web pages, see:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=eresrch%40eskimo.combtnG=Google+Search
So kindly stop going on about this, you seem to fail to realize you're boring
us all to death.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Paul Lowrance
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday
Jed Rothwell wrote:
[snip lots of good stuff]
So have some common sense, and refrain from posting their
addresses. Send them by private e-mail, or at least disguise them by
writing, for example: JohnSmith at-sign mindpring.com
Very nice. Also, if the person has their contact info on a their
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Yo, people:
Here in the Brave New World of the Internet you can cause big trouble by
posting personal information on public forums such as this one. You
should refrain from posting e-mail addresses, although I admit I have
done that myself occasionally. I hope that I
... and I'll add that a persons email and phone # should *not* be published on
the Internet without his or her permission. I'm still a little appalled that
someone at Vo publishing Dr. Mike's email phone #.
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
As an internet group that is widely read we should refrain from
://earthtech.org/principals/index.html
Youse guys are being silly.
Curmudgeon
On 7/17/07, Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... and I'll add that a persons email and phone # should *not* be
published on
the Internet without his or her permission. I'm still a little
appalled that
someone
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Exactly. Post his profile url, silly. People have no business posting
his email phone # until you get his permission, period. That's
common Internet educate. If Dr. Mike wants to remove his email from
the Internet
Paul Lowrance wrote:
There are indeed sites that post your email address, which is why I try
my best to maintain minimum posting at such sites.
As stated, there are sites that have poor educate. Generally smaller sites who
can't afford to program proper anti-spam server code. Google
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
My email address is publish --
http://energymover.googlepages.com/
Yet it's in javascript to prevent spiders, but I certainly do *not*
want
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
I have no idea how many spammers are subscribed to this list, but I
don't see Dr Mike here.
Again you're missing the point. We're trying to deter spam. Google and
other friendly sites spend a lot of money trying
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
I think you missed my point. If you don't want something public then
don't make it so yourself.
I didn't miss anything. The moral of this story -- There will always
be mindless jerk who
thomas malloy wrote:
In his conclusion to Steorn, Dr. Mike wrote;
My conclusion after going through all this is that Steorn is neither
hoax nor scam. It is delusion. The reason it seems surreal is
because it is surreal - we are the real part of someone elses
imagination.
I thank Steorn for
Harry Veeder wrote:
On 12/7/2007 9:18 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
You should check out Google Pages:
http://googlepages.com
Very nice, free hosting, with Googles backbone. I just moved my site
(emwiki.info) to --
No updates yet.
http://energymover.googlepages.com
Paul Lowrance
Good idea
Sure, I'll provide the link to his Steorn profile page so drmike can hide his
email any time his wishes:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/account.php?u=12932
His email is below his 1.8 MB animated image!
Steven Krivit wrote:
Paul,
Can you please get me contact info for Dr. Mike?
thx
s
At
percentage of homeless people hallucinate, not a business and family oriented
individual. Is Sean hallucinating? There's always some probability, but like I
said, it's the least likely theory, by far.
:-)
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
In his conclusion to Steorn, Dr. Mike wrote;
My
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
That's one of the weakest Steorn theories to date. To believe such a
theory one needs to believe Sean seriously hallucinates, as Sean
clearly stated he's seen the Orbo run up to two weeks, in which case
Steorn had to stop the Orbo. Those who truly
It's still there.
Steven Krivit wrote:
uh-huh...I guess it's hidden now...that doesn't help me too much...
At 11:05 AM 7/13/2007, you wrote:
Sure, I'll provide the link to his Steorn profile page so drmike can
hide his email any time his wishes:
LOL, such a funny world of funny people.
Steven Krivit wrote:
aha..most helpful, thx
s
At 02:54 PM 7/13/2007, you wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Steven Krivit wrote:
Paul,
Can you please get me contact info for Dr. Mike?
thomas malloy wrote:
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Paul wrote,,
It sounds like it could be accelerated-- not sure. I'd be surprised
if just anyone could build such a machine using any type of PM and
expect free energy. After glancing at some Perendev motor designs
seemed clear it used the same
It
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Have one of the Harbor Tool devices in hand and will disassemble it today to
see if Paul and Jones are right on how they are doing it or if the wiki
article is correct.
Will not be hard to get an answer with a couple of pull scales and a yard
stick.
Will post the
, with Googles backbone. I just moved my site
(emwiki.info) to --
No updates yet.
http://energymover.googlepages.com
Paul Lowrance
Actually all aforementioned methods use the same principle. Just depends how
cheap the unit is. The type provided in wikipedia rotates the PM rather than
pulling it. Same effect, as both designs require the same amount of energy. The
less expensive designs have less torque. :-)
Stiffler
Looks like a nice unit.
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
HERE IS A LINK TO THE INSIDES OF THE UNIT.
www.stifflerscientific.com/magtool.asp
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE:
DrMikes final report of Steorn:
http://www.eskimo.com/~eresrch/Steorn/final_report.text
I believe the switch merely pulls the magnet back away from the face.
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
The link dd not work after pasting it here,
use the following item# to search for it; 93329-2NDA
-Original Message-
From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
I don't see why such a sim would show OU unless you have a better understand of
gravity that reveals some fundamental KE inherent in gravity, such as radiation.
Radiation can cause a force, but theoretically you can also capture such
radiation energy.
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Paul,
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Paul wrote,,
It sounds like it could be accelerated-- not sure. I'd be surprised if
just anyone could build such a machine using any type of PM and expect
free energy. After glancing at some Perendev motor designs seemed
clear it used the same
Howdy Paul,
It sounds
,
Paul Lowrance
Terry Blanton wrote:
freeenergytracker.blogspot.com
Terry
On 7/5/07, OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Terry:
It looks like the Perendev Motor with magnets in repulsion. In
repulsion, the magnetic domains are eventually misaligned and the
magic stops. Magmos
in legitimate researchers.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
A ...deliberate failure attempt.???
Yeah, that's the ticket. It must be...another conspiracy!
Well, I have not read anyone stating it must be anything. Hopefully this
fiasco will increase the drive in a lot of legitimate researchers to succeed.
LOL
Terry Blanton wrote:
He keeps scratching his nose; or, he's checking to see if it's growing.
;-)
Terry
On 7/6/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bearings (barings) failed.
Terry
On 7/6/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vid of Sean 'splainin' what happened:
Maybe they used plastic bearings made for display.
Mark S Bilk wrote:
Maybe the leprechauns are holding out for a bigger cut of the profits.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Listening to that video is frustrating. ... Damaged bearings??? From
light LOL
on Sunday and as of Tuesday night, McCarthy said it was
functioning perfectly until yesterday when it froze suddenly.***
So the London Orbo was running just perfectly until it froze July 4th.
Paul Lowrance
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
What you said makes sense, except
://emwiki.info
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Terry Blanton wrote:
It looks like the Perendev Motor with magnets in repulsion. In
repulsion, the magnetic domains are eventually misaligned and the
magic stops. Magmos will only work with maggies in attraction where
domain alignment is enforced.
Terry
On 7/5
Paul Lowrance wrote:
I found the following statement by Sean very interesting:
http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single8723
Quote, Steorn say that the intense heat should not affect future
applications of the Orbo technology as this is just a prototype. ***The
prototype
Horace Heffner wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHh5AqQ4_xwmode=relatedsearch=
A self-running Perendev motor would create a stir.
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 5, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHh5AqQ4_xwmode=relatedsearch=
A self-running Perendev motor would create a stir.
The video makes it look like the armature even accelerates when the
stator
Paul Lowrance wrote:
http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single8713
The above article says the Steorn Orbo will be viewable live on the Internet
from 6pm this evening at
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/demo
with four webcams focused on the machine 24 hours a day
?
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Esa Ruoho wrote:
http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/breaking/2007/0704/breaking46.htm
'Free' energy technology goes on display (ireland.com)
Sean McCarthy, chief executive of Steorn, said: What we are showing
basically is a very simplified version of the technology. It's
according to the press release.
Terry
On 7/4/07, Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single8713
The above article says the Steorn Orbo will be viewable live on the
Internet
from 6pm this evening at
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/demo
with four
Yes, today, July 4th, could turn out to be the declared day humanity was freed
from oil!!
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Terry Blanton wrote:
LOL!
Well, I'll check frequently (as I'm sure we will all do).
Meanwhile, is it too early to declare Oil Independence Day?
http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v
Ah, here's the actual Steorn web address:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/demo/demo.html
Tic ... Toc ...
Paul Lowrance
Terry Blanton wrote:
Just posted on their main page:
View the online demonstration here at 6pm (Eastern Time).
Which would be 11:00 pm London time.
Terry
On 7/4/07, Terry
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/demo/demo.html
One camera is online. Nothing to see yet.
Would that be #4? Nothing happens when I click on #4. How long does it take
after clicking on it?
of scaffolding and an audio ad for
astream.com, the vid host.
Terry
On 7/4/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The others give an error page. Only four has a blank image.
Terry
On 7/4/07, Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.steorn.com/orbo/demo/demo.html
And Microsoft Internet Exploder crashes. Tested it on versions 6 and 5.
Paul Lowrance wrote:
Camera 4 shows nothing but Windows media with flag swirling around on
the latest version of Firefox.
Terry Blanton wrote:
It looks like a ferris wheel on the left and it is moving. Slowly.
Terry
?
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Kinetica Museum finally updated their website. It says, Between Shows Our
Next Show : starts July 5th, world's first free-energy demonstration
http://www.kinetica-museum.org/new_site/
Terry Blanton wrote:
Well, uh, no. It's a view of the London Eye, a Y2K fiasco, a scaffold
of sorts and a
It appears the stream is live, as it's getting darker to the point where red
lights just turned on the wheel, no?
Terry Blanton wrote:
Well, uh, no. It's a view of the London Eye, a Y2K fiasco, a scaffold
of sorts and a doorknob (with a door!). If it is from the Kinetica
Museum, the camera
://steorntracker.blogspot.com/index.html
Rather interesting, as this could turn out to be the biggest day in history.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 1, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd
bet this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future
successful Free
art magazine.
* Obtain a provisional patent.
Next step:
* Spend appreciable time to significantly improve the device-- version 2.
* Start a company to mass produce and sale version 2.
What do you think?
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
interpretation was correct. Furthermore, you made some other
scientific statements which IMHO were clearly incorrect, but you would not
address those issue even though I asked several times.
Anyhow, that's all water under the bridge.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
interpretation was correct. Furthermore, you made some other
scientific statements which IMHO were clearly incorrect, but you would not
address those issue even though I asked several times.
Anyhow, that's all water under the bridge.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd bet
this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future successful
Free Energy machine.
Hopefully you are aware that anything patentable that you
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 1, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd
bet this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future
successful Free
That's a good idea. Last time I checked the provisional fee was ~$200.
Also there are companies that charge about the same, which they will publish
your work in a paper magazine issue and an online magazine, which legally holds
up in the U.S. court of law.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Terry
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my Free Energy designs, one being a
mechanical version. This was published in Steorn forum, which
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 30, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my Free Energy designs
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 30, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Open source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source
Prior art
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art
Mud:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mud
Well isn't that special. Your future mud bath plans Horace?
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my Free Energy designs, one being a mechanical
version. This was published in Steorn forum, which I commented on the
possibility that the Steorn Orbo could use the same
Hi,
As a side note there was a major update to my research outline page.
http://emwiki.info
Yesterday I provided two of my Free Energy designs, one being a mechanical
version. This was published in Steorn forum, which I commented on the
possibility that the Steorn Orbo could use the same
echo
leaking pen wrote:
echo
On 6/27/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Messages not getting through, or not coming back . . .
IMHO, such a task is similar to find the boundaries size of --
http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/b/bc/300px-Femtosecond_pulse_shapes.svg.png
One would need to define the critical threshold; e.g., 70% max could be
considered the boundary of the wave/particle.
Paul Lowrance
page is vague, probably far too many insinuations, so over
time I'll have to fill in the missing links.
Enjoy,
http://emwiki.info
Paul Lowrance
will be two keep both cold hot areas as near room temperature as
possible.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
, but IMHO you sure warp your reality. You place thoughts
in your head thinking you know what I'm thinking.
I wish you the best, as IMHO you have a world of anger hate inside you.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
As both sides of the object have twice the surface
area of one side plus a small bit
and John
both weigh 882.4 pounds. Or even, Bob and John weigh 882.4 pounds. Notice
there's no word each, just as in my original text.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 19, 2007, at 2:00 AM, Nick Palmer wrote:
By the way, the ridiculous debate about the radiation from both
sides has mutated slightly - Paul originally said it radiates X
watts PER SQUARE METRE from both sides. He
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace, my time here is to spread truth and logic to a dark world.
OK, it appears you really aren't here trolling for money then.
Indeed that is correct. From the start of this research I have posted at the top
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
The challenge is in building a machine that can capture significant
ambient energy without building a ridiculously large machine. It will
require nano scale technology or darn clever macro scale design. It's
the later
Paul Lowrance wrote:
Furthermore, believe it or not, sitting on the computer and typing these
emails is not only an attempt to find certain gifted individuals to join
this research, but also it's my break time away from such research.
Additionally, at this very moment I am running a computer
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 18, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
If you are only working for humanitarian purposes, post your ideas in
detail. Show us something that hasn't been around since Maxwell's
time. Let's see your engineering, your numbers. Let's see some
specific
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 18, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
I've already repudiated your fuzzy logic claims that I'm inconsistent.
Do you even know what fuzzy logic is?
Yes.
I challenge you to show us my inconsistency.
I feel thoroughly satisfied I have done
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 18, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Yet one more time. I can accomplish such a task alone, but I will not
give up on seeking further help regardless of your efforts.
Of course not! Why would you want to stop your effort yo troll folks to
your group
reality is
beyond help.
LOL, it seems the thugs are all out in force backing each other up now. Retreat,
retreat, lol.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
one side. Lets get an unbiased English major and
see what he or she says? I say that both sides radiates X watts means that
both sides (not one side, not four sides, not 1.5 sides) radiates X watts.
... LOL, thug logic.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Nick Palmer wrote:
Jerks like Lowrance
...
they desperately need repeated hard slaps around the face
...
His pathetic, extraordinarily fuzzy logical
He is undoubtedly an adolescent who thinks he is pretty hot stuff.
...
He is no better than the Red Queen, in Alice in Wonderland,
Word grammar checker is
fine with radiates.
Do you know an unbiased English major? I'd be interested in hearing what an
unbiased qualified person say.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Michel Jullian wrote:
Paul, the phrase is ambiguous. The s at the end of radiates is not correct, subject
being
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Some basic facts present standard physics fully understands and accepts:
Blackbody radiation: At a room temperature of 297 Kelvin (74.93 F,
23.85 C) both sides of a thin sheet of opaque material radiates 882.4
Watts
please confirm that you read my reply to your above statement and that you
now understand heterodyne down from the Thz range is not required to capture
appreciable energy from room temperature gradients?
Thanks,
Paul Lowrance
Paul Lowrance wrote:
Hi Stiffler,
On a macro scale all matter
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Some basic facts present standard physics fully understands and
accepts:
Blackbody radiation: At a room temperature of 297 Kelvin (74.93 F
.
One great option of such technology is the ability to move vast amounts of
energy away from Earth by capturing ambient energy and then radiating such
energy to space by means of electromagnetic radiation.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Please allow me to enlighten you brother. It is not difficult to build
a machine that captures such ambient energy, period! The challenge is
in building a machine that can capture significant ambient energy
without
,
Paul Lowrance
://www.xprize.org
Anyhow, people baffle me! Perhaps politicians don't understand the law of cause
and effect. Someone owes the poor younger generations the apology of a lifetime!
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
size heat-electricity devices to produce
significant electrical energy flow. Presently such devices are not so efficient,
but good enough nonetheless. Here's one well known company that's about to
release such an efficient solid state chip - http://www.powerchips.gi
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
,
Paul Lowrance
/worldclock/
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Stiffler Scientific computer time is -3 minutes of WWVH so where are you
seeing ~ 1/2 hour???
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lowrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 1:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re
did a manual sync and it is now right
on the money...
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lowrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:09 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:wassup wid D2 ?
The reason I mentioned your name was because your emails are staying on top
. On the atomic scale such
temperature gradients approach full scale, which at 297K the gradient could
approach 297K. For example, one atom might be traveling at 5000 m/s (11000 mph),
but a neighboring atom could easily be at a momentary standstill.
http://emwiki.info
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Some recent articles by Tom Bearden on the suppression of overunity systems --
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/index.html
Paul
and 20 seconds time mark.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1610087835473512086
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Michel Jullian wrote:
Apart from his own evidence being clearly insufficient (the burden of proof
should be his), some of his arguments are clearly deceptive. For example, he
claims
Please include his full name-- Harry Paul. Anyhow, was this an accidental
effect H.Paul discovered or was it a prediction by means of physics or is it an
offshoot of another free energy machine?
Paul Lowrance
Terry Blanton wrote:
Paul had never been able to drive an electrical load before
Please include his full name-- Harry Paul. Anyhow, was this an accidental
effect H.Paul discovered or was it a prediction by means of physics or is it an
offshoot of another free energy machine?
Paul Lowrance
Terry Blanton wrote:
Paul had never been able to drive an electrical load before
and 20 seconds time mark.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1610087835473512086
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
Apart from his own evidence being clearly insufficient (the burden of proof
should be his), some of his arguments are clearly deceptive. For example, he
claims
results. WWL Engineers conducted and confirmed one of such tests done by the
engineers at Mississippi State University. I would suggest you watch to video
documentary:
Skip to 2 minutes and 20 seconds time mark.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1610087835473512086
---
Regards,
Paul
results. WWL Engineers conducted and confirmed one of such tests done by the
engineers at Mississippi State University. I would suggest you watch to video
documentary:
Skip to 2 minutes and 20 seconds time mark.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1610087835473512086
---
Regards,
Paul
and 20 seconds time mark.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1610087835473512086
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
Apart from his own evidence being clearly insufficient (the burden of proof
should be his), some of his arguments are clearly deceptive. For example, he
claims
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
