Lou, Axil,
I think Jones Beene has previously cited thermal anomalies of
both heating and cooling, the cooling anomaly is less pronounced than the
heating anomaly. Likewise reports of accelerated half lives of radioactive
gases are more pronounced than reports of
I think there is another type of relativistic effect underlying the numerous
claims of anomalous heat. Naudts paper on relativistic hydrogen points in
the right direction but he fails to elaborate on the unique source of the
relativistic environment. A 1999 paper “The Light Velocity
Jed,
Regarding quote from John Fisher’s letter to DR Rossi below I would encourage
both Fisher and Rossi
To consider Casimir effect on the hydrogen. Increasing the pressure would push
the atoms into tighter confinement
Changing the distance between the grains of nickel powder and
Evidence for the Existence of 5 Real Spatial Dimensions in Quantum Vacuum
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/3-1/calvet-final.htm makes a
good case for the reality of 5- Space based on the physical spacing of Casimir
formula being 1/ D^4.
I am of course having difficulty
Jones, re http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg07832.html
Again I seem to be following a path you already cut – the citation
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/3-1/calvet-final.htm in this 2005
thread is much appreciated. It preceded Bourgoin’s paper and is in
Jed,
You aren’t being fair, Their references on the final page
clearly list a 1993 publication.
Regards
Fran
Jed, I was being facetious, I agree with you totally. It really looks like a
rewrite of other articles done twenty years ago then left to sit in a desk
drawer until recently rediscovered and submitted. The authors are not chemists
or physics oriented but rather teachers interested in making a
Jones,
It is easy to agree with your hypothesis since you swing such a wide net and
using
pycno as a placeholder works fine for me but when you mention after a
population of pycno accumulates
I have to point out this accumulation may not be a material but rather heat
energy and time
Are you suggesting an accumulation of “time dilation” itself? I don’t
understand that.
Actually I should have said accumulation of the rate of dilation which the
Casimir formula says is inversely related to the distance between the walls of
the cavity and which will also result in heat
Jones,
Re-read your paragraph at bottom and now see more clearly what
you were trying to say re-the time dilation argument – regardless Of whether
this is normal trig relationship between acceleration on the spatial vs the
time axis or as I mentioned another type
Where
Wm. Scott Smith said on Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:24:21 -0700
We need to keep the time axis stationary and talk about a molecule's rate of
Speed along the time axis. Setting up the math any other way would be a tough
task!
Scott, I should not have said time axis but rather Time
Jones Beene said on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:09:15 -0700
In the laboratory, for instance - slow muons can be produced in order to
compare their decay rate with fast muons created by cosmic rays. The muon
lifetime has a slow value of x, but the lifetime of a muon traveling at 98%
of
Ok,
just as long as “enhanced probability” could also mean “normal
probability” multiplied by time dilation inside a Casiir cavity :_)
Best Regards
Fran
A new paper “Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst system as a new Power
Source” http://blacklightpower.com/papers/EngPower032610S.pdf reinforces
my conviction that Mills and Haisch – Moddel are both very close but by
refusing to incorporate components of each other’s theory are both still
Considering a new animation to depict Van Der Walls summing into Casimir force.
I got some insight from Models paper and comments from
Other more experienced Vorticians regarding what happens in the nearfield as
gas atoms approach the walls in a Casimir cavity. I think I can model this by
On Sun April 4, 2010 Abd said
That's huge.
He is tracking back from a finding that multibody fusion happens. Most fusion
theories do not allow for multibody fusion at all, I think of Kim, which may be
some kind of variation on Takahashi's theory. Or not. I wish they'd talk to
each other and
Associate Professor,
Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy
Associate Professor,
Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy
Queen’s University
Stirling Hall Room 371
Tel: (613) 533-6804
E-mail: dig...@physics.queensu.ca
Quantum Optics in
Jones Beene said on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:23:13 -0800
[snip]
“The main leap of faith is that a process which is proved to happen in very
cold conditions, can happen less frequently in a temporal or QM situation -
since coldness can be mimicked by other restraints - including time
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:58:34 -0800 Gibson Elliot Gibson Elliot wrote..
Ether is consumed by mass, that's gravity, a pretty measurable effect in my
book!
I agree with Tesla's observation but it is incomplete..you can't just eat
ether endlessly -you must also expell it.
Puthoff's atomic
I have a problem with the MM experiment. They assume an aether that moves with
respect to space yet SR
uses a right triangle rule where the spatial rate is assumed to be
perpindicular to C . Why isn't gamma considered proof of ether? My point is
that the ether may be moving at C
Stephen,
Thank you for the explanation, I wasn't aware of anything called Lorentz
ether theory existed but will be investigating it shortly. At least
I am not crazy - someone with chops came to similar conclusion and now I can
just reference LET instead of trying to reinvent the
There was mention of a combustion engine in new IE issue using inert gases. Is
this what
SPICE is based on? could one gas act like an electrolyte while compressing
bubbles of
the other gas?
Tesla said the sun takes in more energy than it puts out regarding ether- very
much like Puthoffs atomic model
and attributed radioactivty to this force of ether. I have been of the same
opinion for radioactive and pyrophoric materials but am having difficulty
expressing my concept. I believe
on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:08:39 -0800 Jones Beene said
[snip]
More basic query: Is there a progression of this phenomenon (which can be
mistaken for Millsean shrinkage) whereby compound unnatural molecules seem
to grow in mass and shrink in volume when in confinement ? IOW as they
grow in mass
new animation http://www.byzipp.com/scenic.swf
with
new article
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-will-2010-be-year-zero-point-energy-29148.html
Fran
I read an interesting post and comments on Casimir effect that has me
considering how SR and spatial confinement might explain fractional quantum
states in a Casimir cavity. The post was from 2007 and I don’t know if my
comment will ever be added but I brought it here because I think it may
Jones,
I think the Casimir effect is misunderstood and I was using luminal
velocities to indicate the normal requirements in free space to induce
relativistic effects. I strongly suspect that the plates of a Casimir cavity
are to a gas atom what a dead star would be to a spaceship
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:22:14 Jones Beene said
[snip] Others here on Vo - have mentioned or debated the fact that the gravity
force must grow exponentially at close dimensions - IF - grand unification
is accurate. I think it is accurate. Dufour puts some numbers to that
Steve's report is hard to ignore. He provides a step by step legal argument
with supporting documents for a cival suit. Beyond a windfall in punative
damages Purdue also has to worry about further misconduct of other faculty
that led to the allegations . There was a systemic failure to
The Hydrino as defined by Dr Randell Mills has a real fractional quantum
state where the orbital is claimed to be smaller than the Bohr radius. Mills
claim has been rejected by mainstream physics but an alternate theory by Jan
Naudts was better received. Naudts proposed that hydrogen atoms
on Friday, November 20, 2009 2:41:11 AM Mark Iverson said
the discussion about chain reactions in LENR-type experiments...
Not sure if I got the below reference from vortex-l or not, but, in a general
sense, it seems that
it is saying that under certain conditions, normally incoherent
They have been trumped by a government document and know their previous
positions are now all compromised. They built a house of cards and here comes
the wind :_)
-Fran
- Original Message -
From: Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday,
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote
To cause an acceleration means to exert a force. Pressure is the term he
uses, force per unit area.
I agree with Harry that Only a force can cause an acceleration if the law of
inertia is absolutely correct in all situations. However, I think it is
dangerous
Abd,
You are correct that Shawyer does not specifically make any claim regarding
space-time . My interpretation should have been clearly demarcated. My intent
was to suggest a possible scenario where the EM drive might be plausible -
Whether shawyer considered reativistic effects induced
Very interesting that once again relativity is suggested as the arbitrator
between space-time and the device just as Naudts suggested relativistic
hydrogen to redefine the hydrino. It uses microwaves to power a macro cavity
instead of the natural property of conductive plates at Casimir
Robin,
If you mean the basic reason you can't have a real sub ground state the
kinetic energy argument is here http://www.phact.org/e/z/hydrino.htm E=
-me^4/2h^2 OR
The hydrino and other unlikely states by Norm Dombey
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608095 also argues the hydrino
36 matches
Mail list logo
