Rossi has declared: My process has NOTHING to do with
the process of Piantelli. The proof is that I have operating reactors and he
not. He has not said - for example I made an radical improvement of the
existing system- and brought energy from the tens of Watts to the kilowatts
level. No, he made
Peter Gluck wrote:
Rossi has declared: My process has NOTHING to do with
the process of Piantelli. The proof is that I have operating reactors
and he not. He has not said - for example I made an radical
improvement of the existing system . . .
Well, it does not matter what he claims, or
I agree- the essence is that the process works- at high intensity- and very
probably all the other conditions will be solved - we will see with what
price.
The difference between the Piantelli and the Rossi process is the possible
basis of patenting.
As I see the future developments rather soon we
[quote] Part2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD81qF-cIIcNR=1
Now, this is interesting:
The guy (a patent attorney) asks why in the patent there is no mention of
the catalyst, while he now states that there is a catalyst. The guy next
points out that IF there is a catalyst and the catalyst is
On 2011-05-15 21:44, Axil Axil wrote:
[...]
Levi reply:
Please note that he is professor Sergio Focardi, not Levi.
Cheers,
S.A.
5 matches
Mail list logo
