*There are some far-out theories about cold fusion, relating to things like
magnetic monopoles. Most experts dismiss these theories. I cannot judge
them, but I would be very careful not to say the authors are idiots*.
The human mind is compelled to make sense out of the quantum world even if
Global warming has become an extremely polarising issue. There are
strong science based arguments on both sides but whichever side you
believe is to some extent a 'faith based' judgement as you can find
contradictory journal papers and analyses on almost every issue (other
than the actual general
polarizing yes
as was saying an economic cronicle journalist on a frenc TV (BFM, N doze),
there are some suject for which it is hard to make your opinion if you have
both vision and no prejudice.
the vision of Judith Corry, ex-IPCC contibutor, traitor, is that
uncertaineties have been ignored to
Jarold McWilliams oldja...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am not a republican, and I think global warming is a sham.
I believe you are technically wrong about that. However, it is somewhat off
topic. I think we can agree that cold fusion calorimetry is much easier to
understand than climate science. The
Jarold McWilliams oldja...@hotmail.com wrote:
Are you saying that oil companies would rather try to hide cold fusion than
adapt to it?
Yes, I am certain they would. They are trying to hide global warming with
the help of the Republican party, with considerable success.
Did they pay off
]:Are oil companies suppressing cold fusion? Probably not, but I am
sure they will.
Jarold McWilliams oldja...@hotmail.commailto:oldja...@hotmail.com wrote:
Are you saying that oil companies would rather try to hide cold fusion than
adapt to it?
Yes, I am certain they would. They are trying
About strength of lobbies things might not be like most people imagine.
it is true that oil company are strong lobbies. they kille nuke in US
afeter three miles island. but oil is a local product for US, so a kind of
protectionism.
in france some imagine that nuke is a lobby. not in fact, execpt
Mark Goldes mgol...@chavaenergy.com wrote:
I largely agree with Jed's comments. However, I am an emotional optimist
and an intellectual pessimist.
I am not optimistic or pessimistic. I have read a great deal of history. I
have read and talked to many people who lived through the worst of 20th
There is one thing good to remember that we are not living nowhere near
laissez-faire capitalism. If any company would be exposed in any attempt to
hinder the development of viable cold fusion technology, it would
considered the worst economic crime in the history. And it would lead into
huge
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
There is one thing good to remember that we are not living nowhere near
laissez-faire capitalism. If any company would be exposed in any attempt to
hinder the development of viable cold fusion technology, it would
considered the worst economic
I wrote:
If you were to change the laws in the US, and you offered a $10 bounty for
the heads of women and children, I am certain you would find hundreds of
thousands of people who would gleefully go around chasing down, shooting
and decapitating innocent people and bayoneting small
I am not a republican, and I think global warming is a sham. According to your
theories, couldn't global warming just be a ploy to get more money out of
consumers? The climate always changes. Even in a worst case scenario
predicted by some scientists, it will not end in the apocalypse like
Fukishima disaster? How many people died in this disaster? 3 so far, 0 from
radiation.How much was the damage to property? How many people died when a
renewable energy dam broke? About 1,000 and probably about the same economic
damage with the homes washed away. There were also fires
13 matches
Mail list logo