Also see
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.2261v1.pdf
Optical analogue of spontaneous symmetry breaking induced by tachyon
condensation in amplifying plasmonic arrays
We study analytically and numerically an optical analogue of tachyon
condensation in amplifying plasmonic arrays. Optical propagation is
You may have hit on an important point, Stephen. The hydrogen nucleus (any
nucleus) contains antimatter/matter pairs, according to the standard model.
If we take this literally – then the disintegration event could start simply
with finding an irradiation window where these pairs are forced
Mesons come from tachyion condensation inside a SPP black hole. The SPP
holds energy of 1,000,000 GeV give or take. EMF captured by the SPP is
reformatted into a quark based subatomic based discharge: Mesons. A tachyon
condensate is broken chiral symmetry of the magnetic force.
See
Yup it's certainly astonishing if true.
If a Nucleon is disintegrating this way, I wonder how it still can meet
conservation rules. In order to form pions it implies quark anti quark pairs
with combinations of up and down quarks are formed from a nucleon. In effect
the equivalent quarks for a
From: Stephen Cooke
* That nucleons may actually disintegrate is nothing short of
astonishing! Is this what they are actually saying? Did they really observe
such huge amounts of energy?
Yes precisely. This is why it will be more controversial than cold fusion
until replicated. Many
se.
>>
>> Which ever the case its astonishing amount of energy to release in one
>> reaction almost up there with matter antimatter annihilation.
>>
>>
>> --
>> From: jone...@pacbell.net
>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
Does anyone else find these just too incredible to believe?
>
Very much so. I should spend some time looking at the raw data. Holmlid
may have something interesting. His interpretation may have sufficiently
Why does it take so long for the Holmlid effect to manifest?
When you have to pump energy into a population of black holes that stores
huge amounts of energy, it take time and a lot of EMF power to do this. But
once these solitons are well formed and their power storage threshold is
reached, they
During a typical replication run of the Rossi effect, the pressure of the
hydrogen gas goes down over a relatively short timeframe. This might mean
that hydrogen Rydberg matter(HRM) has formed in major part because gas is
transformed into a solid. But the reaction does not take off immediately.
Dear Jones,
please allow me to offer this to my readers on EGO OUT, citing you. Thanks!
Peter
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Very interesting presentation this morning. Ólafsson was both low key and
> optimistic that Holmlid is onto something
thank you, it is fine, few things happen these days, at leats so we know.
Peter
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> OK
>
>
>
> *From:* Peter Gluck
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Jones,
>
> please allow me to offer this to my readers on EGO OUT, citing you. Thanks!
>
>
OK
From: Peter Gluck
Dear Jones,
please allow me to offer this to my readers on EGO OUT, citing you. Thanks!
Peter
antimatter annihilation.
From: jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:16:42 -0700
Subject: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
Colloquium at SRI
Very interesting presentation this morning. Ólafsson was both low key and
optimistic that Holmlid is onto something important
ap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
During a typical replication run of the Rossi effect, the pressure of the
hydrogen gas goes down over a relatively short timeframe. This might mean that
hydrogen Rydber
rtex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
During a typical replication run of the Rossi effect, the pressure of the
hydrogen gas goes down over a relatively short timeframe. This might mean that
hydrogen Rydberg matter(HRM) has formed i
can do the job without extra help.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 12:15 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
>
> During a typical repl
My attitude is to wait and see proof. I have serious doubts that the evidence
will survive proper scrutiny.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 10:57 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Collo
...@pacbell.net
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:16:42 -0700
> Subject: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
>
> Very interesting presentation this morning. Ólafsson was both low key and
> optimistic that Holmlid is onto something important. Alan Goldwater also
&g
gt;
> --
> From: jone...@pacbell.net
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:16:42 -0700
> Subject: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
>
>
> Very interesting presentation this morning. Ólafsson was both low key and
> optimistic that Holmlid i
theory is not proven to be required for LENR.
>
> No one has ever captured a small black hole and lived to tell about it!
> :-)
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri,
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:02:02 -0400:
Hi Axil,
[snip]
>I got through to Holmlid but Holmlid does not believe in black hole LENR
>causation. I am now faced with the bleak prospect of learning black hole
>physics, string theory, tachyon physics and general relativity.
Done that
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:55 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:02:02 -0400:
> Hi Axil,
> [snip]
> >I got through to Holmlid but Holmlid does not believe in black hole LENR
> >causation. I am now faced with the bleak prospect of
theory is not proven to
be required for LENR.
No one has ever captured a small black hole and lived to tell about it! :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 4:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Collo
sage-
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 5:00 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
>
> The rotation of polaritons in a vortex produces a ANALOG black hole. Any
> wave structure in a vo
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>> Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 5:00 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
>>
>> The rotation of polaritons in a vortex produces a ANALOG black hole. Any
>> wave structure in a
ave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','janap...@gmail.com');>>
>>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>>>
renced in that video
>>>> produces hawking radiation.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:09 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I believe you are referring to a simulation of a black hole.
>&g
I believe you are referring to a simulation of a black hole.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 5:00 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
The rotation of polaritons in a vor
From: David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2015 4:39 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI
>
> SPP's are one thing, small black holes another. Why is there any reason
> to believe that a black hole is required
n Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:09 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I believe you are referring to a simulation of a black hole.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>
In reply to David Roberson's message of Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:31:28 -0400:
Hi,
It occurs to me that lasers in plasmas have previously been used as bench top
particle accelerators. I wonder if that also applies in Holmlid's experiments?
(See e.g.
Very interesting presentation this morning. Ólafsson was both low key and
optimistic that Holmlid is onto something important. Alan Goldwater also
presented his open source work on the basic glow reactor of Rossi/Parkhomov.
At first glance, there would appear to be no connection between the two
Regarding: ** weeks to accumulate **.
Could this long preparation time be the reason for fuel preprocessing as
seen in the Lugano fuel sample?
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Very interesting presentation this morning. Ólafsson was both low key and
>
33 matches
Mail list logo