On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(However if you include the Ni mass in the energy density calculation and
assume
1 H/Ni, then you get about 21640 eV / H atom which is beginning to stretch
the
friendship a bit.)
Do your calculations make assumptions about the
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Mon, 26 May 2014 08:37:09 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(However if you include the Ni mass in the energy density calculation and
assume
1 H/Ni, then you get about 21640 eV / H atom which is beginning to
Triple helixes are not involved in replication. The DNA/DNA/RNA
version forms when RNA that is produced from the DNA then wraps itself
around the double stranded DNA and it thne restructures itself to form a
triple helix.
This will only happen with pure DNA if the sequences are palindromic.
From: Eric Walker
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(Still not impossible, as the maximum energy you can get
from Hydrinos is 137^2
x 13.6 eV ~= 255 keV (actually precisely half an electron
mass) from each
I agree with that line of thinking. I also think the Dirac sea is a
Stormy Sea
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Eric Walker
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(Still not impossible, as the maximum energy
Nickel is a special LENR metal because it reflects near infrared light the
best of any material.
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Eric Walker
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(Still not impossible, as the
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If we must choose between the two major non-nuclear hypothetical sources for
power density in LENR – some version of the Dirac sea (ZPE) seems to beat
out electron shrinkage by a country mile ...
I rather like the imagery
From: Eric Walker
If we must choose between the two major non-nuclear
hypothetical sources for
power density in LENR – some version of the Dirac sea (ZPE)
seems to beat
out electron shrinkage by a country mile ...
Jones, I like your thinking about that some people wants glory and
megabucks while others just want to know why. I like the generous
attitude and I think that AR should make liaisons with people who mostly
wants to know why in as many ways as possible.The secrecy and the
misleading maneuvers do
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Fri, 23 May 2014 20:57:54 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(Still not impossible, as the maximum energy you can get from Hydrinos is
137^2
x 13.6 eV ~= 255 keV (actually precisely half an electron mass) from each
In reply to Nigel Dyer's message of Sat, 24 May 2014 15:04:02 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
Triple helixes are not involved in replication. The DNA/DNA/RNA
version forms when RNA that is produced from the DNA then wraps itself
around the double stranded DNA and it thne restructures itself to form a
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 21 May 2014 20:24:38 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
For instance, relativistic electron pumping via
Dirac mechanics would not be nuclear.
Is this a Dirac sea mechanism?
Aside from a nuclear
In reply to Nigel Dyer's message of Wed, 21 May 2014 17:31:32 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
And not just LENR. I am currently looking at how this may occur in the
copper that is associated with DNA/DNA/RNA triple helixes
Are triple helices involved in DNA replication, and if so if the copper attached
to
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I assume that by 10E7 you actually mean 1E7 , i.e. 10 million ;).
Yes -- it would be nice for my argument if it were 10E7, but really it's
1E7. :)
(However if you include the Ni mass in the energy density calculation and
assume
1
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(Still not impossible, as the maximum energy you can get from Hydrinos is
137^2
x 13.6 eV ~= 255 keV (actually precisely half an electron mass) from each
Hydrogen atom.)
This is to full redundancy? I think there's an effect that is
In consideration of the recent posting regarding converting light into
mass, the upper limit of energy density is set by the speed of light
at 2.5 x 10^13 Wh/kg. Although the scientists have not actually
converted photons to electrons and positrons, a controlled reverse
process can be conceived
And not just LENR. I am currently looking at how this may occur in the
copper that is associated with DNA/DNA/RNA triple helixes
Nigel
On 20/05/2014 16:28, Jones Beene wrote:
With all the recent talk about the overlooked magnetic component of LENR -
and spin coupling - at least for Ni-H and
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Dyer
And not just LENR. I am currently looking at how this may occur in the
copper that is associated with DNA/DNA/RNA triple helixes
Cyril Smith says: If we wish to use Larmor precessions as charge pumps,
but without external microwaves maintaining the
50 million in US with autoimmune diseases and growing. We are cooked (by
microwaves)
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Dyer
And not just LENR. I am currently looking at how this may occur in the
copper that is
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
In consideration of the recent posting regarding converting light into
mass, the upper limit of energy density is set by the speed of light at 2.5
x 10^13 Wh/kg… Such process would not necessarily involve any nucleus.
Yes - Exactamundo… this is
recent data on kids, shows that the consumption of antibiotic while young
kid is doubling asthman and alergy...
more generally the hygiena hypothesis seems validated since long and denied
by mainstream because of inconvenient conclusion that don't please the
whistleblowers that have their
I have been looking at copper because it has an interesting relationship
with the DNA triple helix.There is no evidence that iron has such an
intimate relationship. The Copper 2+ ion is magnetic, and is
borderline between being ferro and ferri magnetic, and I suspect that
biology has
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
In consideration of the recent posting regarding converting light into
mass, the upper limit of energy density is set by the speed of light
at 2.5 x 10^13 Wh/kg. Although the scientists have not actually
converted
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
For instance, relativistic electron pumping via
Dirac mechanics would not be nuclear.
Is this a Dirac sea mechanism?
Aside from a nuclear source, we have as possibilities f/H shrinkage,
something coming out of the Dirac
With all the recent talk about the overlooked magnetic component of LENR -
and spin coupling - at least for Ni-H and the Rossi effect, here is an
excellent older paper which may contain insight on another piece of the
puzzle, even if it was written to explain a completely different phenomenon
(the
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Since many observers seem wedded to a fusion
scenario, despite the lack of any relevant indicia of a nuclear reaction,
this insight from Cyril may be limited to those on the fringe of the
fringe.
There is at least one
From: Eric Walker
There is at least one relevant indicium that NiH is a nuclear process:
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_04.png
Hmm… your assumption seems to be that if any reaction is an outlier to the main
grouping, and much higher in energy or
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If you think about that logically for a while, you will probably realize
that your conclusion is false for reasons related to the incompleteness of
the chart.
Far from the conclusion that the location on the Ragone chart
28 matches
Mail list logo
