On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Robert Greenyer has a different take on Rossi's initial product: a dogbone
heater element for furnaces.
Nice homework on Greenyer's part. He makes an interesting case that IH is
going to try to make use of LENR in an
Robert Greenyer has a different take on Rossi's initial product: a dogbone
heater element for furnaces.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyp14fnE1jQ
I think the Blue Box space heater for Asia makes more sense.
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
in such a way that the net COP
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I think the Blue Box space heater for Asia makes more sense.
Why not do both. After all, if you're about to enter the market with
a revolutionary product with no patent protection to speak of, why not
stampede the market?
Blaze sez:
That being said, I do believe Rossi might have messed with the fuel or the
extraction of the fuel in some way to mis direct, so if you want to
re-write your analysis to hold for that, I'd be cool with it.
I just won't accept that the scientists purposely lied.
So, how much money
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:05:35 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
5) The second iteration of the Blue Box for China will contain about
100+ low temp E-Cat sub-units, each with average COP of about 2, but staged
in such a way that the net COP is infinite (which is simple to do,
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Oct 27, 2014 5:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Deconstructing Rossi
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 26 Oct 2014 09:05:35 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
5) The second iteration of the Blue Box for China will contain about
100+ low temp E-Cat sub-units, each
Vorticians.
We have played the deconstructing Rossi game before on vortex - which is
to say, trying to look for hidden motives - which could have been there all
along, but the overall scenario has been intentionally clouded by conduct
which is puzzling at best, and self-destructive at worst.
Hi Jones,
As always, I have learned to appreciate the creativeness of your conjecture.
I have to admit, some of your speculation actually comes across to me as
plausible... in a fashion.
I noticed you came up with 12 deconstructions. Personally, I think that's
an awful lot of conjecture
Your theory kind of relies on Levi and Crew being frauds and liars...
Because Rossi wouldn't trust them to be incompetent.
Conspiracies of that nature just don't work except in the minds of nutjobs.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Vorticians…
We
That being said, I do believe Rossi might have messed with the fuel or the
extraction of the fuel in some way to mis direct, so if you want to
re-write your analysis to hold for that, I'd be cool with it. I just
won't accept that the scientists purposely lied.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 7:33 PM,
10 matches
Mail list logo
