Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-20 Thread Rob Dingemans
Hi, It's so sad to notice that my gutfeeling about Defkalion was unfortunately right. On 15-5-2014 20:11, Jed Rothwell wrote: It seems the whole thing fell apart after Rossi broke the contract. My guess is that he never transferred the technology to them. That's what he said, and I suppose

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Foks0904 .
I haven't made up my mind one way or another, I want DGT to succeed as I've always had a certain amount of belief in them despite their shortcomings, but in regards to labeling Jed as biased, couldn't the same be said of you? I.e. that it's comforting to think Gamberale is unfairly attacking and

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Axil Axil
Experimental information describing the Ni/H reactor is dammed hard to come by. With the negativity toward DGT shown by much of the LENR elite, our best source of this precious info will be cut off for no good reason. What good does it do for Jed to undercut anyone in this field, especially such a

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Foks0904 .
*our best source of this precious info will be cut off for no good reason. What good does it do for Jed to undercut anyone in this field, especially such a rich source of info.* DGT isn't basing their decisions to release information to the public based on what Jed thinks or has to say on the

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: As has been mentioned, we don't know much about Gamberale. We do know a lot about him. Lewan has a link to his biography, and he just added this to his blog: Gamberale has a PhD in theoretical high energy physics from the University of Milan, and at

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Experimental information describing the Ni/H reactor is dammed hard to come by. Yes, because Defkalion refused to publish anything. Now that Gamberale has published and Xanthoulis, the president of Defkalion confirmed him, we have all experimental

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Daniel Rocha
Where did you get that Defkalion Europe was a joint venture? -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Axil Axil
I am referring to the documents and presentations produced by Dr. Kim with DGT for ICCF conferences. Have you read any of them? Does Rossi produce like data? On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Experimental

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Axil Axil
I judge the MIT conference that DGT pulled out of as a sign of disgust with the powers that be in the LENR field and the first step at going dark to them for DGT. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: I am referring to the documents and presentations produced by

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: I am referring to the documents and presentations produced by Dr. Kim with DGT for ICCF conferences. Have you read any of them? Kim based his statements on data from Defkalion, showing excess heat. That data was completely wrong. It was either a mistake or

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: I judge the MIT conference that DGT pulled out of as a sign of disgust with the powers that be in the LENR field and the first step at going dark to them for DGT. They pulled out because they knew this scandal would soon break. They knew the jig was up. I

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Axil Axil
DGT was producing steam, not 212 water. The change of state energy from water to steam was not reflected in the COP calculations. Yes this is inaccurate, but gross under estimate of the COP. I am depending on memory, correct me if I have erred. Jed, you are whipping yourselfer into a frenzy of

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Axil Axil
Recombination shoud read Recrimination. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: DGT was producing steam, not 212 water. The change of state energy from water to steam was not reflected in the COP calculations. Yes this is inaccurate, but gross under estimate of

RE: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jones Beene
Gamberale has a PhD in theoretical high energy physics from the University of Milan, and at the Milan based Pirelli Labs he has further developed the theoretical work in coherent electrodynamics by his countryman, late Dr. Giuliano Preparata. Among his experimental work he has been assessing

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Daniel Rocha
The level of competence needed to verify the claimed error is not much higher than of a plumber. But, you don't know the staff of DGT to make such claim. 2014-05-16 13:07 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net: Gamberale’s level of competence surpasses the entire staff of DGT by an

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Axil Axil
*Judas Iscariot* was said to be the brightest of the 12 apostates, but the least trustworthy. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Gamberale has a PhD in theoretical high energy physics from the University of Milan, and at the Milan based Pirelli Labs he

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Kevin O'Malley
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Jed, you are whipping yourselfer into a frenzy of [recrimination]. Pot, meet kettle.

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Axil Axil
The right word might be crimination. I don't believe that I am meeting the spirit of Jed's responces as follows: 1. to charge with a crime. 2. to incriminate. 3. to censure (something) as criminal: condemn On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri,

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Judas Iscariot was said to be the brightest of the 12 apostates, but the least trustworthy. Just the opposite, according to the Gnostic Gospel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Judas

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: DGT was producing steam, not 212 water. They were producing a little steam because there was no water flowing into the cell. The change of state energy from water to steam was not reflected in the COP calculations. Yes this is inaccurate, but gross under

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: The level of competence needed to verify the claimed error is not much higher than of a plumber. Not higher at all. Any plumber on earth could have verified it in 10 minutes. That is exactly what plumbers do when they test boilers. You can see that in

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: The right word might be crimination. I don't believe that I am meeting the spirit of Jed's responces as follows: 1. to charge with a crime. 2. to incriminate. 3. to censure (something) as criminal: condemn Franco Cappiello implied they are criminals, or

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: I heard from Mike Nelson today, and confirmed that is what it was. More extensive tests were needed. DE finally did these extensive tests, and now we know the facts. I mean that Mike Nelson said More extensive tests were needed. Lewan described Nelson's report: The report was

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-16 Thread Daniel Rocha
Maybe DGT made a mistake with a hose! -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com

[Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
Many people here feel bad that they were taken in by Defkalion. For example, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: I vividly recall the forum BS. Many questions were asked concerning module testing which they insisted was happening within their lab. Looking back now I realize that they

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
I am going to upload Gamberale's report to LENR-CANR.org. I will add a news item about Lewan's book and this report. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-15 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: I called Alexander Xanthoulis and asked for a comment. He didn’t dispute the result of the report but pointed out that the calorimetric set-up at the Milan demo was not made by Defkalion but by Mose. Gamberale confirmed

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

2014-05-15 Thread Axil Axil
Human nature demands that you believe the guy who states exactly what you want to believe. Gamberale gives Jed a warm feeling. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: I called