Re: [Vo]:Exciting predictions from 1958

2007-05-29 Thread thomas malloy
Horace Heffner wrote: On May 27, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Horace Heffner wrote: Yep. Looks like there is still 5 years to go: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-04/dnl-rpb042507.php On May 27, 2007, at 10:51 PM, thomas malloy wrote: I thought is was 50 years My nephew, the power

Re: [Vo]:Exciting predictions from 1958

2007-05-28 Thread thomas malloy
Horace Heffner wrote: On May 26, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Out of Time Quote: No one wants to predict definitely how long it will take. It couldn't possibly be less than ten years, says Sir John Cockcroft. It might be as long as 50. Twenty plus is about the most reasonable

Re: [Vo]:Exciting predictions from 1958

2007-05-28 Thread Horace Heffner
On May 27, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Horace Heffner wrote: Yep. Looks like there is still 5 years to go: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-04/dnl-rpb042507.php On May 27, 2007, at 10:51 PM, thomas malloy wrote: I thought is was 50 years My nephew, the power company executive

Re: [Vo]:Exciting predictions from 1958

2007-05-27 Thread Horace Heffner
On May 26, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Out of Time Quote: No one wants to predict definitely how long it will take. It couldn't possibly be less than ten years, says Sir John Cockcroft. It might be as long as 50. Twenty plus is about the most reasonable guess. (still one year

Re: [Vo]:Exciting predictions from 1958

2007-05-26 Thread Jones Beene
Out of Time Quote: No one wants to predict definitely how long it will take. It couldn't possibly be less than ten years, says Sir John Cockcroft. It might be as long as 50. Twenty plus is about the most reasonable guess. (still one year to go for Sir John's prediction ;-) Hmm... Perhaps...