Is this a report of the same demo for which we previously saw the
video. I dont think the high voltage arc discharges appeared in the
video, and seem to be quite different to the low voltage electric arc
welder style demo. Both demos come within the patent description.
For the high
JOnes,
0.5 C is easy enough to measure.
What I found disappointing was the COP = 2.8
-Original Message-
From: a.ashfield
0.5 C is easy enough to measure.
What I found disappointing was the COP = 2.8
Even that inflated estimate could go away with a poof when they measure P-in
from the wall, which should always be done with pulsed power.
But the huge disappointment in
I thought it was an interesting report, but I think a fundamental issue may
be getting missed in the calorimetry of the BLP experiment.
As I understand it, the calorimeter was modified to have the large copper
electrodes that supply the very high spot welder current placed into the
test chamber.
If the past is prolog, the Papp engine produced very little if any heat.
The same will be true for the Mills engine.
Mills engine energy production will come from two places: pressure/shock
wave expansion with associated plasma movement and the production of excess
electrons. These two energy
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/GlumacReport2.pdf
A tenth of a degree or less rise in temperature in the calorimeter.
Everything extrapolated from that. LOL.
attachment: winmail.dat
What was the S:N ratio?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/GlumacReport2.pdf
A tenth of a degree or less rise in temperature in the calorimeter.
Everything extrapolated from that. LOL.
7 matches
Mail list logo
