Re: [Vo]:Fusion as process or result

2011-06-17 Thread Jouni Valkonen
Idea with this fusion is that in fusion two light nucleous merge. But there is no good evidence that this reaction is plausible in low energy (without muons). However LENR does not exactly specify what does happen, but has more experimental approach. But in my opinnion Steven is perhaps wrong

Re: [Vo]:Fusion as process or result

2011-06-17 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 07:44 AM 6/17/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote: Idea with this fusion is that in fusion two light nucleous merge. But there is no good evidence that this reaction is plausible in low energy (without muons). That's a common opinion, but it's not true. See Storms, Status of cold fusion (2010),

[Vo]:Fusion as process or result

2011-06-16 Thread Harry Veeder
- Original Message From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:52:34 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Steve Krivit's initiative At 02:15 PM 6/14/2011, Alan Fletcher wrote: He sure is a hard-liner on the term Cold