-----Original Message-----
From: fznidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com>
To: vortex-l-request <vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sun, Sep 18, 2011 8:37 am
Subject: hammering me and cold fusion in Germany
Quote from planet hunter
Regarding "cold fusion" is indeed so, that in recent years, repeatable
experiments were carried out, but we find no explanation for it - resulting in
a paper do so?
This sentence is arrant nonsense. I have to explain why, or you yourself want
to think about it, how you argue this?
So is there anything to it already.
No. There are no serious conferences will, and there is no reproducible
results. Cold Fusion Science was short times, but is now run almost exclusively
by spinners. Because there just are no experimental confirmation.
I would like to get said (sorry, I'm so passive there), here and there, because
it makes nonsense, wrong assumptions or similar requires
Super, so I will deal further with this stuff and write a rebuttal to
understand layman.
Rather jump from banks or lenders get off, for fear of losing the (oh so)
reputation. Managers are demoted or fired, just because they have tapped a
sensitive issue. A little more courage would not hurt really.
Why do not you think to yourself sometimes critically, instead of parroting
this crap? It is not difficult to learn and find out why the field is so dead.
The reasons lie elsewhere. Paper . Let's start with
Znidarsic's constant Vt qualifies the velocity of the transitional quantum
state.
Already in the introduction of a constant named after himself. That's enough to
have proper context as Crank.
Low Level Nuclear reactions proceed in a domain of 50 nanometers.1, 12,13 They
have a positive
product of the thermal thermal coefficient.The frequency domain and the size is
one megahertz-meter.
Misuse of terminology ("thermal frequency"). Completely unmotivated product
alleged "domain size" with the peak wavelength of blackbody radiation at an
unspecified temperature.
The product of the disk size and radio-
frequency stimulation which, as in the case with ColdFusion, one
megahertz-meter.
Typical numerical mysticism.
Electromagnetic energy flow strongly from the parent to the daughter states
during transition.
No. This sentence makes no sense. In the transition from a higher to a lower
state of energy is released.
It is reasonable to assume that the other
natural forces interact so strongly during transition.
Not at all. It is finally an Electromagnetic transition.
The flux of the force fields flow strongly, and at
range, from the parent to the daughter state.
Nice alliteration, complete nonsense. "Parent" and "Daughter states" are in
general spatially overlapping.
A convergence in the motion constants uncouple the frequency of the EMITTED
photon from the frequency of the emitting electron.
A convergence of the constants of motion decouples ... Siinnfrei. What could
possibly be decoupled? What is the "frequency of the electron"? What to do with
the frequency of the photon?
This theorem authors, "The Constants of the Motion Tend toward those of the
electromagnetic in
a Bose condensate that is stimulated at a dimensional frequency of 1094
megahertz-meters "
A big Bose gas Bruach lower frequency than two small ones? Even if the two
small ones are just as big as the big one? Anyway, who's suddenly the Bose gas?
Vt Describes the velocity of the emitting
structure.
What speed? What moves it? now I'm tired of detailed comments. The main problem
is that the author expresses nothing coherent, one could criticize. How does
one determine when it is based on faulty assumptions, if it ever does not
define a simple set of assumptions but unmotivated rate ranks? yet what firmer
hand:
Einstein's General Theory of Relativity states that a force can induce a
field.The gravitational
gravitational field of the electron may be coupled to the outward force of its
confined energy.Newton 's
formulation of gravity was set equal to Einstein's formula of gravitational
induction in Equation (2 ).
Needless to say, that the "outward force" again is an unmotivated
zahlenmystischer any nonsense. In any case, says nothing of the kind of ART. A
search for the keyword illuminates the facts: This fascinating world of law is
used exactly one author, and it has also devised. No, not Einstein.
We get one later classical radius of energetic accessibility, an elastic
constant of the electron, a discontinuity of elastic displacement,
electromagnetic and gravitomagnetic flux, a transitional centric electronic
state, Lengths of energetic accessibility .... and this is only an excerpt. Not
one of the terms has a counterpart in known physics. Not one is explained or
motivated. All calculations are funny combinations of a few classic formula,
such as the Coulomb or E = mc ². None of these calculations yields a prediction
motivated some interesting measurement result. Everything is based purely on
physics education, not only calculations but also what the author holds for
quantum mechanics or relativity theory.
Last edited by I (07/07/2011 at 14:39 Clock)
