This is not Mark Gibbs' site but an aluminum mineral which may be relevant
to this discussion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbsite
Gibbsite is Al(OH)3 is one of the minerals found in bauxite. Unlike other
hydroxides, it is stable at high temperature.
We are told that in the Rossi reactor
According to Albert, adding 25 MWhrs (90 gigajoules) of any form of energy
to an object increases its mass by 1 milligram, even though no matter has
been added... and vice-versa.
In the case of the AR glow-tube, where 1.5 MWhr has been reported, the
equivalent mass loss would only be about 60
Yeah might be pulling protons out of the Dirac sea to combine with
electrons, or something like that
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
According to Albert, adding 25 MWhrs (90 gigajoules) of any form of energy
to an object increases its mass by 1 milligram,
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:13:20 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
If 0.006 gm of H has to supply 1.5 MWh, then each atom needs to supply 9.3 MeV.
This is not out of the question, if the right reaction is found. However if it
only acts as a catalyst for neutron transfer reactions,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
What's the point? The point is that if there is a real paradigm shift here,
then it does not necessarily have to nuclear fusion as the source, not even
involve the nucleus. We should be thinking outside the box ... err...
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:50 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However if it [hydrogen] only acts as a catalyst for neutron transfer
reactions, then nowhere near that
amount would be needed.
My current theory is that the hydrogen plays no role in this particular
instance. Perhaps elsewhere, deep
6 matches
Mail list logo
