Re: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-30 Thread Xavier Luminous
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:08 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to  Xavier Luminous's message of Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:56:53 +0200: Hi, [snip] On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:22 PM,  mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to  Xavier Luminous's message of Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:28:25 +0200: Hi, [snip]

Re: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-30 Thread mixent
In reply to Xavier Luminous's message of Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:32:30 +0200: Hi, [snip] The reason this doesn't happen is not because the Bohr model is impossible. The reason is that a smaller orbit than the ground state would require a change in angular momentum of the electron that is less

RE: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-30 Thread Jones Beene
Robin, Once again you appear to miss the point. The point is that it's not an either/or situationSometimes an electron can take up a Bohr orbit fleetingly, IOW it's not forbidden by the Schrödinger equation The question is, can you prove this statement wrong? This is a good point, and

Re: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-29 Thread Xavier Luminous
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:53 PM, lorenhe...@aol.com wrote: First tho, I need to know if there's anyone out there who knows how to calculate the regulating of energy to a Housing of Electromagnetic sections, of which is configured to closely surround an SRC (spinning armature center), which

Re: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-29 Thread mixent
In reply to Xavier Luminous's message of Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:28:25 +0200: Hi, [snip] This Bohr model picture of the atom is incorrect. Electrons do not orbit the nucleus of an atom, so there's no centrifugal force component (though they are bound via quantum mechanical principles). -X Prove

Re: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-29 Thread Xavier Luminous
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to  Xavier Luminous's message of Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:28:25 +0200: Hi, [snip] This Bohr model picture of the atom is incorrect.  Electrons do not orbit the nucleus of an atom, so there's no centrifugal force component (though

Re: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-29 Thread mixent
In reply to Xavier Luminous's message of Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:56:53 +0200: Hi, [snip] On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to  Xavier Luminous's message of Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:28:25 +0200: Hi, [snip] This Bohr model picture of the atom is incorrect.  Electrons

[Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-28 Thread LORENHEYER
I know there's a certain amount of determination and/or enthusiasm to come-up with a viable LENR system that can produce an output significantly more that the input, but I think persuing a HENR with little or no radioactive waste, should be given equal consideration,,, which, I'm sure already

Re: [Vo]:Highly ENRgized C-force ='d by E-force ='s IFO

2012-03-28 Thread mixent
In reply to lorenhe...@aol.com's message of Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:53:30 -0400 (EDT): Hi, [snip] In an atom the centrifugal force experienced by an electron can be balanced with the centripetal force of electrostatic attraction, yet atoms show no particular desire to accelerate away as a