- Original Message -
From: John Fields [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Hi Mike,
Is the new solid fuel process commercially viable? The implication
over at the BLP web site has been that the new-and-improved process
has been proven experimentally to self-generate through well-known
chemical
From Mike Carrell:
IMHO the solid fuel reactor is the closest to commercial
viability of anything so far posted by BLP. BLP usually
can back up such posts by experimental work, as stated.
The fact that critical details are glossed over I interpret
as evidence of ongoing patent application
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:IPKat - weblog: The continuing incredible adventures of
Dr. Randell Mills
From Mike Carrell:
IMHO the solid fuel reactor is the closest
Mike Carrell wrote:
You need several in a bulletproof demo -- or one tested in a skeptic's lab.
NO! No, no, no! Big mistake.
You need some pretty good demos that are tested in a friendly supporter's lab.
Ignore the skeptics and their labs. After the last battle has been
fought, victories
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:IPKat - weblog: The continuing incredible adventures of
Dr. Randell Mills
Mike Carrell wrote:
You need several in a bulletproof demo
From Mike Carrell:
Mills is no fool, nor are his board of directors. He
business strategy is very different from Jed's concept
-- but there could be a global scramble of
entrepreneurship when BLP becomes real. Mills has to
have his 'ducks in order' for what might be a firestorm.
The new
: [Vo]:IPKat - weblog: The continuing incredible adventures of Dr.
Randell Mills
An unfavorable review of recent BLP patent activity over in UK. The
blog also includes excerpts from the UK patent office. Apparently, Dr.
Mills legal team was unsuccessful in persuading the UK Patent Office
From Mike Carrell:
A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and force
the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this type have been
seen before. The process of overcoming them is iterative, lengthy,
expensive, and private. It is reasonable to believe
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:07:54 -0500, you wrote:
From Mike Carrell:
A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and force
the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this type have been
seen before. The process of overcoming them is iterative, lengthy,
9 matches
Mail list logo
