In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:20:03 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>Do you see where this is going? If not, let me a little more direct: does a
>"burning bush" come to mind ?
or crop circles?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
:03 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion may fade by 2024
Terry Blanton wrote:
> Either there are Watchers or we're damned lucky bugs.
Ah... the Watchers. Here is a new twist.
The concept of a "Watcher" as a base level intergalactic probe incorp
Terry Blanton wrote:
> Either there are Watchers or we're damned lucky bugs.
Ah... the Watchers. Here is a new twist.
The concept of a "Watcher" as a base level intergalactic probe incorporating
advance AI is fascinating. After all, there is little doubt that the expected
cost of
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:40 AM Jones Beene wrote:
> Maybe that is coincidental.
>
Or maybe William Bramley is right in *The Gods of Eden*. ("Blanton, will
you never shut up about that book and *The 12th Planet*?")
We burned up our fossil fuel to create a blanket of CO2 and methane from
Somewhat ironic that interest in LENR has an ~11 year period... which is also
seen in the sunspot cycle...
... which really isn't exactly 11 years, but... somehow it manages to be a very
good fit over time.
One 'big picture' irony lies in the fact that solar energy itself has become
See Fig. 1, Downloads per month, here:
https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213
The trend line in this graph so far is remarkably stable and symmetrical.
It peaked after 11 years in 2013. If present trends continue, it will fall
close to zero around 2024.
The bottom graph, Google Trends
6 matches
Mail list logo
