But this is fission, the opposite of elemental creation. All the
same, more evidence for non-homogeneous isotopic distribution.
T
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
A different theory:
http://ow.ly/4M7VL
mic
So I wonder what *Natural* isotopic abundance means? Is it an
average? Over which part of the universe?
Natural is keyword in food marketing, but here? :-)
mic
2011/5/3 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
But this is fission, the opposite of elemental creation. All the
same, more evidence for
BTW reading on the numbers you will see that Ni in the crust is
disappearing! We must start burning it before is too late! ;-)
mic
2011/5/3 Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com:
So I wonder what *Natural* isotopic abundance means? Is it an
average? Over which part of the universe?
in our case, natural is a reference to whats found on earth, yes no?
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
So I wonder what *Natural* isotopic abundance means? Is it an
average? Over which part of the universe?
Natural is keyword in food
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Alexander Hollins
alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
in our case, natural is a reference to whats found on earth, yes no?
In nature.
T
Yes, tell me why Carbon 13 is more common than Carbon 12 in some parts of
the Universe. This was discovered by the Swedish Satellite Odin.
David
David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, David Jonsson
davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, tell me why Carbon 13 is more common than Carbon 12 in some parts of
the Universe. This was discovered by the Swedish Satellite Odin.
Because you are looking into the past when you measure electromagnetic
7 matches
Mail list logo
