On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Bob Higgins wrote:
>
>
>> My primary observation about the Budko-Korshunov experiment(s) is that it
>> is reporting on a variable space that has never been reported to show XH.
>>
>
> I hope
Bob Higgins wrote:
> My primary observation about the Budko-Korshunov experiment(s) is that it
> is reporting on a variable space that has never been reported to show XH.
>
I hope you are right.
You should inform the authors.
- Jed
My primary observation about the Budko-Korshunov experiment(s) is that it
is reporting on a variable space that has never been reported to show XH.
The temperature was too low and the pressure was too high to replicate
positive experiments with Ni + LiAlH4. The experimenters could not hope to
.
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 5:06 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:JCMNS Vol. 23 uploaded
Rossi includes a EMF stimulus of an electrostatic field of between 50 and 100
Kilovolts in his patent that was not used in the referenced expe
Rossi includes a EMF stimulus of an electrostatic field of between 50 and
100 Kilovolts in his patent that was not used in the referenced experiment.
This neglect of using this appropriate stimulus might be the cause of the
negative LENR effect.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Jed Rothwell
I uploaded the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, Vol. 23:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedv.pdf
I regret to say that it includes yet another study of Ni-H that showed no
excess heat:
Budko, K. and A. Korshunov, *Calorimetric Investigation of Anomalous Heat
Production
6 matches
Mail list logo