I posted it as a test, but I should have removed the END at the bottom as I
assume that was not in the rejected post.
Looks like it got through, so not idea why it didn't post from Jed's
account.
Maybe some funny encoding got put in the original that did not survive copy
and paste?
On Mon, Jan
Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I will look for the designs that I can repair. The LENR devices should be
like a navy reactor where the sailors can do the repairs.
That is not going to happen, I am afraid. The whole trend of technology for
the past 50 years has been towards modularity
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a sticking point with this one idea, however -- there's an
economic incentive for vendors to set things up so that people are locked
into their own technology. If you bought an Apple computer and lose or
destroy the power adapter . . .
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Your vision of the LENR future is too limited.
I am not talking about LENR. I am talking about the economics and cost
efficiency of different energy systems, such as central generation, PV and
-- in the future -- LENR. Every technology has built-in
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe some funny encoding got put in the original that did not survive
copy and paste?
I thought that might be it, so I copied, pasted and sent it again in the
same thread, Why cold fusion will not need . . . I got the reject notice
and I checked the
Cities organization in Switzerland already
guiding the industries future.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Message that will not post
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Jed Rothwell
[This is strange. This message keeps coming back with an error. It is not
important, but let me post half of it to see what is rejected.
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Your vision of the LENR future is too limited.
I am not talking about LENR. I am talking about the economics and cost
[Here is the rest . . . I wonder if this will post.]
Standards are narrowed down to one or two for many reasons, primarily
because the design engineers, tech support people, service people and
others can only master one or two techniques, and there is a limited amount
of RD money. Once a good
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It is because manufacturers, people, and society as a whole are not
inclined to test many different implementations after a reasonably good one
is found. We find something that works and we stick to it.
Overall the
9 matches
Mail list logo
