What do you make of the fact that the calibration runs were done after the
apparent excess heat runs (based on the dates on the charts)? Would be
nice to have a full step-up and step-down calibration and raw data rather
than results. It's hard to know what to make of the report without more
I added some information from Saito et al., including a schematic, and
calibrations and excess heat tests at 72 W, 345 W and 750 W. See pages 6 -
12:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTsupplement.pdf
I described this as a "replication," but as you see in my brief report, it
should be called a "verification." Mizuno provided both the reactor and the
mesh. Still, Saito and his students made the calorimeter and confirmed the
excess heat. This is a step forward. Other efforts to replicate have
I am pleased to report that Mizuno sent me some photos and data from a
replication now underway in at the Hokkaido University of Science in
Sapporo (https://www.hus.ac.jp/eng/). Input is 500 W and output is ~650 W.
I uploaded some details and graphs. See p. 6:
4 matches
Mail list logo
