I've added an energy balance report under the Files section of the group
titled
Rossi Does the Math - Then I do the Math
Criticisms, anyone?
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Damon Craig decra...@gmail.com wrote:
No comments??
If you don't know where to find the report by Dr. G. Levi look
No comments??
If you don't know where to find the report by Dr. G. Levi look here,
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/H-Ni_Fusion/join
This Yahoo group has become my own personal blog and rant about this fiasco.
I have included first-hand reports and video evidence under the Files and
Links
There is no auxilary heater, whater that means--forgetaboutit.
In all editions of the device we have had available to view, rendered naked,
Mr. Rossi has a band heater to heat the water within the water jacket. Does
everyone know what a band heater is? If not, go Google.
Mr. Rossi has also
It's a very strange method of control.
Damed straight it is. Something appears very wrong. The evidence shows-up in
Levi's original report (test #1) showing the device operating in the first
quadrant where an increase in input heat energy generates an increase in
reaction heat. A decrease in
Make that TEST#2. Notice the divot in the temperature curve.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Damon Craig decra...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a very strange method of control.
Damed straight it is. Something appears very wrong. The evidence shows-up
in Levi's original report (test #1) showing the
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
While two heaters is possible, it's not what is reported. The description
here is a bit garbled. There are two chambers, the reaction chamber and the
cooling chamber. There may be a third chamber, a closed
Sergio Focardi interview
From: joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
wrote:
While two heaters is possible, it's not what is reported. The description here
is a bit garbled. There are two chambers, the reaction
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
http://evworld.com/press/e-cat_cutaway.jpg
Two heaters. The internal heater makes sense for bringing up the Ni-H to
operating temperatures (and, presumably, keep it there). It's the purpose of
the external
Perhaps auxiliary heater is for preheating inlet water so that the
temperature gradient of water is smoother. This would help to maintain more
constant temperature in the core and thus increase controllability, as heat
energy from reactor core is used for making steam at constant temperature,
but
At 07:27 AM 7/22/2011, Robert Leguillon wrote:
http://evworld.com/press/e-cat_cutaway.jpg
Two heaters. The internal heater makes sense for bringing up the
Ni-H to operating temperatures (and, presumably, keep it there).
It's the purpose of the external heater that's puzzling.
How
Without exact details of external and internal geometries,
thicknesses, and volumes, the world is whistling in the dark re any
attempts to make and test dummy copies of the Rossi reactor, with some
Ni micropower and no catalyst, to establish the null hypothesis that
the observed complex
OK. So no one has looked closely at the goofy temperature curve in the Levi
report of the December 16, 2010 demonstration which he claimed was evidence
of an exothermic reaction (and cold fusion).
Here's an analysis I wrote a few weeks ago:
In his report Levi claimed the temperature curve of
At 06:47 AM 7/21/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
OK. So no one has looked closely at the goofy temperature curve in
the Levi report of the December 16, 2010 demonstration which he
claimed was evidence of an exothermic reaction (and cold fusion).
There is a copy of the report at
That's fairly amazing, as quantum theory says nothing about particles,
flittering, flitting or otherwise.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:07 AM, francis froarty...@comcast.net wrote:
Abstract: One of the most surprising predictions of modern quantum theory
is that the vacuum of space is not empty.
Sorry about that. I'm sure the remainder of the article could be
interesting.
Simply put, my objection is the the inclusion of particles rather than
quanitzed fields in this abstract statement. Particles, as existent things,
are an addition to quantum mechanics, not part of it. Nothing in quantum
Yes it is. How would you explain it?
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
The Lewan demo shows no such clear increased heating phenomenon, so that
data is even more puzzling.
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of exothermic
activity?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 06:38 PM 7/15/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 03:21 PM 7/15/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A new interview to Sergio Focardi
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 10:30:12
Jones Beene wrote [snip]If there is a dynamical Casimir effect (DCE) in any
anomalous-energy system,such that force is converted into energy (or
negative energy) in anongoing process, then it can be either hot or cold (or
net neutral) relative to an external
At 03:27 AM 7/17/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of
exothermic activity?
It's unclear what Damon is responding to. However, a change in the
slope of a heating curve will generally indicate some variation in
condition, such as changed input
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 03:27 AM 7/17/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of exothermic
activity?
It's unclear what Damon is responding to. However, a change in the slope of
a
At 06:21 PM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
At 03:27 AM 7/17/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of
exothermic activity?
It's unclear
I agree the core is hotter and the Casimir regions where the heat anomaly is
born may be even hotter yet. I know Jones Beene posits these areas can be
considered cold due to confinement but myself being of a relativistic
perspective think these hot and cold labels are not up to the task. A
Curie
On 2011-07-16 00:21, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
A new interview to Sergio Focardi has been posted on Passerini's blog here:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html
Google translated short link: http://goo.gl/nxcMG
By the way, apparently, according
From: francis
* I agree the core is hotter and the Casimir regions where the heat
anomaly is born may be even hotter yet. I know Jones Beene posits these
areas can be considered cold due to confinement but myself being of a
relativistic perspective think these hot and cold labels are not
to convert the change in relativistic frames into real spatial
velocity as they disassociate while discounting the thermal levels needed -
sometimes even below the energy cast off upon association at the start of
runaway.
Regards
Fran
RE: [Vo]:New Sergio Focardi interview
Jones Beene
Sat, 16
At 06:38 PM 7/15/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 03:21 PM 7/15/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A new interview to Sergio Focardi has been posted on Passerini's blog here:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html
Google translated short link: http://goo.gl/nxcMG
It
Hello group,
A new interview to Sergio Focardi has been posted on Passerini's blog here:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html
Google translated short link: http://goo.gl/nxcMG
It contains some interesting bits of information. I recommend reading it.
At 03:21 PM 7/15/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A new interview to Sergio Focardi has been posted on Passerini's blog here:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html
Google translated short link: http://goo.gl/nxcMG
It contains some interesting bits of information. I
28 matches
Mail list logo
