Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

If the cooling effect is real then could also be indicative of an unfamiliar form of energy storage. Harry On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > @Vibrator, > > > > As you imply, some form of negative hysteresis would be the Holy Gail for > alternative

RE: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

@Vibrator, As you imply, some form of negative hysteresis would be the Holy Gail for alternative energy – better than LENR. I am not sure that it is fundamentally contrary to ferromagnetism, so much as requiring a core which has both antiferromagnetic domains or zones which are juxtaposed

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

Interesting thoughts from Jones here - certain viscosity effects result in systems with time-dependent net energies - and negative hysteresis losses would indeed be OU, since the "induced" B field would be automatically changing under zero applied H field, and a freely-alternating (time-varying)

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

I have a recent discussion of physics forums on these experiments, rather informative, for whom is interested. https://www.physicsforums.com/conversations/bound-states-of-spinning-magnets.80338/

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

message-- > *From: *H Ucar > *Date: *Thu, Mar 24, 2016 23:23 > *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com; > *Cc: * > *Subject:*Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter > wise spinning of magnets > > > Counterwise rotation in this case is an anomaly from e

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

another realization of this cw spinning > experiment at > https://youtu.be/-XKbRrea-CA > > > -- Original message-- > *From: *Vibrator ! > *Date: *Wed, Mar 23, 2016 23:15 > *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com; > *Cc: * > *Subject:*Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound s

RE: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

In trying to find out what the phenomenon is called – the one that Hamdi refers to – the concept of “hysteresis drag” comes up - and the concept of a “hysteresis drag cup output device” came up in a patent. https://www.google.com/patents/US4885489 This would be relevant if the magnetic

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

the air resistance is transmitted to the track by the wheels and continue to push it back.  -- Original message--From: H UcarDate: Thu, Mar 24, 2016 23:23To: vortex-l@eskimo.com;Cc: Subject:Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets Thanks for the updates and clarifications, i'd inferred incorrectly that the samples were only suspended from below and that the reason for posting was anomolous levitation... having now watched the series on YT everything's

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

Thanks for the updates and clarifications, i'd inferred incorrectly that the samples were only suspended from below and that the reason for posting was anomolous levitation... having now watched the series on YT everything's clear. If you followed the original whipmag discussions, i concluded

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

This is true if diametrically polarised magnets are placed side by side as gears. Al (of whipmag) termed this config as 'gearwise' and the case of magnets spinning in same direction as 'counter gearwise'. He hed obtained cgw with a composite magnet assembly apperently self running. I had

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

Photos attached. See my comments below. https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipMlej_5bSpRg2fZ6KbaTD7RYmQ0cgvU1RXC9BpX > Vibrator ! Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:04:38 -0700 > What are the relative polarities - are they axially or diametrically  > polarised (poles on opposite faces or same face)? Both are

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

(ETA. counterclockwise synch is interesting and also easily replicable, at least in diametrically magnetised rotors, Again though, if this is an axially polarised levitation then this too is anomolous. Have to say, everything's pointing to diametric polarisation - alternatig fields, so Earnshaw

Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

What are the relative polarities - are they axially or diametrically polarised (poles on opposite faces or same face)? Assuming axial magnetisation and that both are common permanent magnets, the floating weight is levitated by reuplsion in apparent defiance of Earnshaw's theorem (since, per

[Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

That is while the base magnet attached to motor in a vertical axis spinning clockwise, the floating magnet in air keeps spinning counter clockwise in phase locked mode 1 cm above the base magnet. In order to obtain this mode the floating magnet is initially forced to spin counter wise using air