Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

The energy of the blackhole would not be necessarily electromagnetic waves or e/m fields in static form, there are views where gravitation field has energy density, allowing a bh can be made of pure gravity! As gravitational field can "escape" from event horizon, the energy of the bh might be

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:44:19 -0600: Hi, [snip] >On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, wrote: > >BTW, as I have said before, black holes are empty. All matter is converted >> to energy at or before the event horizon, and circulates as EM energy at

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:09:56 -0500: Hi, [snip] >OK, if we assume that Hawking is correct and that black holes loose mass by >radiation, why does this not eventually lead to the black hole having less >mass than is required in order to remain a black hole?

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:09:56 -0500: Hi, [snip] >OK, if we assume that Hawking is correct and that black holes loose mass by >radiation, why does this not eventually lead to the black hole having less >mass than is required in order to remain a black hole? >

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

Personally I doubt the integrity of the bridge so I won't be exploring it. ;-) Harry On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Black hole science is supposed to be the bridge between general relativity > and quantum mechanics. Exploring this connection is the

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

http://phys.org/news/2015-01-black-holes-space-theory.html#nRlv Black holes do not exist where space and time do not exist, says new theory "If we restrict our description to scales at which space and time exist, then the apparent paradoxes associated with black holes seem to naturally resolve,"

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

Entangled photons? On Monday, February 1, 2016, wrote: > In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:44:19 -0600: > Hi, > [snip] > >On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, > > wrote: > > > >BTW, as I have said before, black holes are

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 31 Jan 2016 21:17:08 -0600: Hi, [snip] >>Ian Durham, a quantum physicist at Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire, >> agrees that the black-hole paper is wrong but should have been accepted by >> arXiv, so that the students could be exposed to community

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:48:25 -0500: Hi, [snip] >A thought. Before the star becomes a black hole it has plenty of mass located >at the center that can be measured just like in the case of our sun. Why >would this original mass be converted into energy in

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:32 PM, wrote: It time flows forward outside a black hole, and stops altogether at the > event > horizon, does it flow backwards inside the black hole, or is it just > constant at > zero? > Here's another thought: a black hole might be a special

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:55:57 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Entangled photons? I doubt it. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

A black hole is an object that radiates energy via Hawking's radiation no matter how small it is. An polariton soliton could be considered a black hole if it is found to be a Hawking radiator. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyMYcqxuZ_I Prof. Daniele Faccio found that a glass sphere radiates

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

There is recently an article highlighted one promote failure http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/science-needs-to-fail (Zepelin argument is well known to engineers. One only learn from i's failures. Success give you confidence, but too much give you unjustified confidence).

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

Black hole science is supposed to be the bridge between general relativity and quantum mechanics. Exploring this connection is the beat sort of science. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, H Veeder wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alain Sepeda

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

mind an interesting possibility. Can a black hole have a non black entry and exit path especially during its formation process? Dave -Original Message- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Jan 31, 2016 11:44 pm Subje

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

t brings to mind an interesting possibility. > Can a black hole have a non black entry and exit path especially during its > formation process? > > Dave > > > > -Original Message- > From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.co

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > For those who noticed > - the message of Brian Josephson whistleblowing some exchange between > moderator to block Ferara tests > - the effective blocking of lugano test > > there is an article by Nicolas Gisin (an

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

the effective mass would not be relevant from that time forth. At least until it evaporates completely. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Feb 1, 2016 12:09 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censors

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Sun, 31 Jan 2016 23:24:33 +0100: Hi, [snip] >For those who noticed >- the message of Brian Josephson whistleblowing some exchange between >moderator to block Ferara tests >- the effective blocking of lugano test > >there is an article by Nicolas Gisin (an

[Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

For those who noticed - the message of Brian Josephson whistleblowing some exchange between moderator to block Ferara tests - the effective blocking of lugano test there is an article by Nicolas Gisin (an insider of science, not a rebel) http://www.iqoqi-vienna.at/nicolas-gisin/ Nature try to

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, wrote: Once again, ALL real breakthroughs are initially "manifestly outlandish". > Hence > nothing really valuable will ever get published. Apparently nothing paradigm-challenging, at any rate. There is someone on LENR Forum who does not

Re: [Vo]:On Arxiv censorship

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:40 PM, wrote: BTW, as I have said before, black holes are empty. All matter is converted > to energy at or before the event horizon, and circulates as EM energy at > the event horizon, warping spacetime into a circle. ;) What kind of energy? The