In reply to JonesBeene's message of Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:17:46 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>Nigel
>
>With water, there is the phenomenon of proton hopping even without
>cavitation.
>
>The Hagelstein paper you cite proposes a neutron analog of electron hopping in
>semiconductors. This means that there
Nigel
With water, there is the phenomenon of “proton hopping” even without
cavitation.
The Hagelstein paper you cite proposes a neutron analog of electron hopping in
semiconductors. This means that there are two natural phenomena on which to
model neutron hopping.
Protons hop from one
One of the systems mentioned in Hagelstein's 2015 paper
(http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/108/04/0601.pdf) is the
Vysotskii system where what appears to be a coherent collapse of
cavitaion bubbles causes a shock wave to travel through a metal plate
and generate a very sharp pulse of
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:19:31 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
Another possibility is that fast daughter nuclei rip through the lattice
creating lots of free electron - ion pairs. As the electrons return to the ions
in a strong magnetic field, they will emit cyclotron
The Mossbauer effect has been mentioned in many past LERN experiments where
gain is seen -- but in a nebulous way. In fact nickel as well as iron has a
Mossbauer isotope (61 Ni)
Despite the association of heat with gamma radiation of any kind, when a
thermal anomaly is seen with iron it is
Robin,
Yes it is clear that Meyer got the theory wrong - and possibly most of the
data. Other features of the experiment are interesting in a historical context.
I can find no claimed replication online.
The significance of his experiment today is mostly in relationship to the more
recent
Bob, thanks for the heads up. I will look at the references.
From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 11:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonon–Nuclear Coupling
Here are some more idea
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sat, 28 Oct 2017 07:06:06 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>Going back to the general principle of stimulating the element iron with waves
>of another type and/or frequency, in order to cause actual isotope
>transmutation - there is another entry: the Meyer-Mace device
7 8:45:33 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonon–Nuclear Coupling
What happened to Meyer-Mace? Does anyone know?
Another link from 2008-09 regarding the Meyer-Mace device withadditional
comments is here:
http://overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generato
dynamo.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 7:06:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonon–Nuclear Coupling
;
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 7:06:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonon–Nuclear Coupling
Going back to the general principle of stimulating the element iron with waves
of another type and/or frequency, in order to cause actual isotope
transmutation - there is another entry: the
Going back to the general principle of stimulating the element iron with waves
of another type and/or frequency, in order to cause actual isotope
transmutation - there is another entry: the Meyer-Mace device which received a
flurry of attention 20 years ago, was patented and then all but
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:09:37 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hi Robin
>
>The neutron hopping modality is indeed one way that gain could happen.
>
>In fact you are probably referring to Hagelsteins 1993 paper where he
>introduces this concept wrt palladium.
>
>I do not
ilto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 1:06 PM
To: Vortex List<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: [Vo]:Phonon–Nuclear Coupling
Think about this: a process for converting sound into x-rays but not involving
hydrogen or sonoluminescence<https://en.wikipedia.org/
Hi Robin
The neutron “hopping” modality is indeed one way that gain could happen.
In fact you are probably referring to Hagelstein’s 1993 paper where he
introduces this concept wrt palladium.
I do not think he was envisioning iron as the active metal at that time.
Perhaps he will be reminded
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:06:29 -0700:
Hi,
57Fe+57Fe => 58Fe + 56Fe + 2.399 MeV
>Think about this: a process for converting sound into x-rays but not involving
>hydrogen or sonoluminescence
.
>
>The conference papers from ICCM/20-Sendai includes an important but
Think about this: a process for converting sound into x-rays but not involving
hydrogen or sonoluminescence….
The conference papers from ICCM/20-Sendai includes an important but overlooked
paper
“Developing Phonon–Nuclear Coupling Experiments with Vibrating Plates and
Radiation Detectors”
17 matches
Mail list logo
