@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's theory of the LENR reaction - LiHy4-.pdf
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:58:59 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:57:12 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
There is very little Li7 in the ash, so
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's theory of the LENR reaction -
LiHy4-.pdf
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:58:59
+1000:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:57:12 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
There is very
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:39:48 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In that detection method, Lithium ions cannot remain without electrons
through an acid bath.
Take another look at the binding energy of the new particle. (See the last
column in the table at the bottom of the pdf
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:58:59 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:57:12 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
There is very little Li7 in the ash, so the high masses based on Li7 might be
below the detection threshold.
The values for Li
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 20:15:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What Is not clear in common sense terms... if the fuel has more lithium than
the ash, why does the fuel need to wait to be loaded into the reactor for the
reaction to take hold. placing some nickel powder into
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:25:08 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
resistant to temperatures up to half a million degrees Kelvin. An acid bath is
just going to wash them nice and clean, if there are any left. ;)
Actually I may be wrong about this. It may be possible for the
If a lithium atom were to replace 1-3 electrons with hydrinohydrides as a
stable molecule, this surely would show up in the SIMS of the fuel in the
Lugano report. SIMS measures mass and you would see a spectrum of
6Li+(1,2,3) and 7Li+(1,2,3), or m/z=8,9,10 should show up and they don't.
A
What Is not clear in common sense terms... if the fuel has more lithium
than the ash, why does the fuel need to wait to be loaded into the reactor
for the reaction to take hold. placing some nickel powder into lithium
should get te reaction going if reaction is all up to hydrinos.
On Sat, Jul 18,
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:57:12 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
There is very little Li7 in the ash, so the high masses based on Li7 might be
below the detection threshold.
The values for Li + 3 hydrinos can indeed be ruled out as you suggest.
That leaves Li6 + 1 or Li6 + 2 with
In that detection method, Lithium ions cannot remain without electrons
through an acid bath. The lithium ions will have been completly
neutralized. The detection method will detect lithium as the results of the
method have proven. Your assertion does not make sense. The analysts would
not use a
If the Ni62 reaction is based on Li, and the nickel is completely converted
to Ni62, then the particle should be complettely saturated with lithium on
an atom for atom basis.
But the percentage of lithium was reduced from 1.17% as fuel, to 0.03% as
shown on the last page of the Lugano report.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:21:04 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
But how did the lithium get inside and at the center of the nickel
particle. A few post ago you invented a new type of neutral particle do do
that.
The neutral particle is a triangle of Hydrinohydride ions (each with
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:12:56 -0400:
Hi,
1) Lithium could get out the same way it got in.
2) ICP-AES relies on electron spectra, but the particles I'm talking about have
no more electrons in normal orbitals, so the Li will not show up in the
analysis. If
13 matches
Mail list logo
