The vacuum according to experts, including Dirac, is not empty. If the
vacuum reacts with any kind of matter, it reacts with hydrogen.
The prior post was based on the proton mass of 938.27231 MeV or 1876.545 for
two protons, and the mass of the deuteron being 1875.613 MeV.
Thus splitting
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Falsifiability - look for radiation inside the reactor at the approximate
level of 90 or 45 keV.
And, while you're looking, check for spontaneous emission, ie coherence.
When the understanding and credibility of LENR is well entrenched is main
stream science, the Mizuno (Yoshino) experiment and others like it will be
a first of the primary and indispensable tools used to explore and
quantify dark energy and its place in the universe.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at
Part I
The recent Mizuno (Yoshino) presentation at the MIT colloquium and the
surprising implication of finding about twice the quantity of hydrogen
appearing as ash from deuterium reactions (as the starting gas) after a
month long run - has been the inspiration for the following early stage
Part II
When a free neutron decays to a proton, substantial energy is released as
well as a neutrino - which carries away about 40% of the net energy
undetected. That is the main problem to overcome in framing a putative
exothermic deuterium reaction in place of the endotherm which would normally
I favor the idea that a strong magnetic field can catalyze pion virtual
particles from the energy borrowed from the vacuum that can disrupt the
nucleus of the atom along the path of that magnetic field.
If a plus pion transmutes a neutron into a proton using borrowed energy
from the vacuum (135
Come to think of it, this pion reaction is a mind bender. This Mizuno
reaction is the exact opposite of the proton-proton chain reaction. That is
the fusion reaction by which stars convert hydrogen to helium. If the
proton-proton chain reaction produces positive energy, then its opposite
fission
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
They say that the data never
lies; but wow, does LENR really get all or most of its energy from the
vacuum.
I have always thought so. But, then, I have been a Puthoff fan-boy
for ages. :-)
Yes - even if plausible way exists in QM for converting deuterium to
hydrogen with gain, that gain obviously does not derive from the mass of the
deuterium, per se.
This leaves these main possibilities, and a few others
1) vacuum energy (ZPE)
2) nickel mass via spin coupling
3) Mills version
Entwined as in a tree with vacuum energy (ZPE) as the tap root, and the
others (if real) as emergent pathways of energy flow.
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes - even if plausible way exists in QM for converting deuterium to
hydrogen with gain, that
One other exotic possibility comes to mind, thinking about Ni-64. This
nickel isotope appears to be unique in the periodic table, being the highest
ratio of excess neutrons in a stable isotope, compared to the most common
isotope of that element (36/30 = 12%) in nature. (hydrogen-deuterium does
Just wanted to add one minor thought to the discussion. Could it be that the
breaking up of the D into pieces might actually take energy from the system
that is then added back by a relatively minor amount of more or less standard H
reaction with nickel? The implications of such a process are
12 matches
Mail list logo
