In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:19:18 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I guess the reason is that LENR has always been considered a condensed
matter reaction, not a gas or liquid phase reaction. The alumina is still
solid, even if the Ni is not. If we consider the Ni to be the LENR
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Wed, 31 Dec 2014 05:23:05 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
It's very difficult to make this type of seal. When the cement is wet, the
hydrogen easily passes through. I use a dangerous gas detector as I heat
it up, but as yet, have not achieved a seal in experiments I've
]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
Ryan Hunt (HUG, MFMP) did a post-mortem on the reactor tube from the first
experiment with the dogbone and fuel as described by Parkhomov. He found a
gross failure of the seal of the plug in the tube. Also, because he didn't
shake it to distribute
It's very difficult to make this type of seal. When the cement is wet, the
hydrogen easily passes through. I use a dangerous gas detector as I heat
it up, but as yet, have not achieved a seal in experiments I've tried. A
lot of the cement requires heating to fully cure, but heating causes
Why don't just ask Parkhomov?
2014-12-31 9:23 GMT-02:00 Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com:
It's very difficult to make this type of seal. When the cement is wet,
the hydrogen easily passes through. I use a dangerous gas detector as I
heat it up, but as yet, have not achieved a seal in experiments
Yes!
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean, achieved a device to bring on global cooling??
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 6:58 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cheme...@gmail.com'); wrote:
It could have been worse, we
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on analysis of Lugano and Parkhomov work, excess heat begins at about
950C. The MFMP dogbone core was measured to be over 1200C and no excess
heat was found.
As I said, I have a feeling that is too hot. I think the Lugano temperature
may have
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
Based on analysis of Lugano and Parkhomov work, excess heat begins at about
950C. The MFMP dogbone core was measured to be over 1200C and no excess heat
was found. The likely suspect
CB Sites wrote:
Wow, Replication fails. They had the dog bone so hot the steel stand
holding it was white hot. But power in was equal to power out. No radiation.
My take on it was that the MFMP dogbone may suffer from a bad design choice,
more so than from a leak.
The
I think the heater is a heater; and Kanthal as the heater wire has nothing
to do with it. We now believe that Rossi may have used a SiC heater
element and that also has no Ni.
I also don't believe that the H2 just comes out through the 99.8% high
purity alumina reactor tube.
The tubes MFMP
Message -
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
I think the heater is a heater; and Kanthal as the heater wire has nothing to
do with it. We now believe that Rossi may have
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
I think the heater is a heater; and Kanthal as the heater wire has nothing to
do with it. We now believe that Rossi may have used a SiC heater element
From: Bob Higgins
*
* I think the heater is a heater; and Kanthal as the heater wire has
nothing to do with it. We now believe that Rossi may have used a SiC heater
element and that also has no Ni.
The SiC is nonsense. You have no basis for the belief that kanthal has nothing
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:58 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
It could have been worse, we could have lost heat from the universe
This worried James Joule.
Harry
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, CB Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
As best as I could tell, it looks like
See inline below ...
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø I think the heater is a heater; and Kanthal as the heater wire
has nothing to do with it. We now believe that Rossi may have used a SiC
heater element and that also has
away?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Dec 31, 2014 10:06 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on analysis of Lugano
From: Bob Higgins
* JB: Then you are mistaken. The purity is immaterial – the porosity is
everything. Of course, if MFMP used a fused tube then that is another design
flaw.
* BH: The tube MFMP used is a high purity, high (near theoretical)
density alumina tube
Well, there you
See inline below ...
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø JB: Then you are mistaken. The purity is immaterial – the
porosity is everything. Of course, if MFMP used a fused tube then that is
another design flaw.
Ø BH:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
What puzzles me the most is why such a small amount of nickel is not
completely vaporized by an emission of that much heat. Again, this
suggests the possibility that the LENR output is low energy photons, which
I guess the reason is that LENR has always been considered a condensed
matter reaction, not a gas or liquid phase reaction. The alumina is still
solid, even if the Ni is not. If we consider the Ni to be the LENR active
material, I presumed it needed to be in some form of condensed state.
On
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Jed, The setup used by MFMP uses the surrounding room temperature as the
sink for heat generated within their device.
Room temperature air. Water transfers heat a lot better. I'll bet there is
a larger temperature difference between the inside and the
From: Bob Higgins
* CoorsTek is the major supplier of such alumina forms - they have been
around forever in this market. The choice is AD998 (99.8% alumina) or mullite
( http://css.coorstek.com/scripts/css512.wsc/op/op_indexB2C.html ).
Yes - CoorsTek is no doubt the major US supplier,
See inline below ...
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Bob Higgins
Ø None of these substrates are porous.
That may not be true for even the specialty material CoorsTek 998, but
clearly 96% is porous and in fact anything less than 100%
cross section with Uranium.)
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
Jed, The setup used by MFMP uses the surrounding room temperature
:* Wednesday, December 31, 2014 10:09 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
Jed, The setup used by MFMP uses the surrounding room temperature as the
sink for heat generated within their device. That should appear cooler to
the actual heat generating device than a water
]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Jed, The setup used by MFMP uses the surrounding room temperature as the sink
for heat generated within their device.
Room temperature air. Water transfers heat a lot better. I'll bet there is a
larger
From: Bob Higgins
Ø The fact that the alumina is not 100% theoretically dense does not mean
that the remainder is air/porosity. The remainder is a much lighter weight
silicate glass in the grain boundaries
The density of silicates is slightly lower than alumina - 2.65 compared to 3.95
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:39 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
In either of these three cases I would expect the active device to get
hotter than had it been subjected to open air cooling. The trend is the
same.
The device may be hotter than it would be in the case of open-air
@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
Jed, The setup used by MFMP uses the surrounding room temperature as the sink
for heat generated within their device. That should appear cooler to the
actual heat
Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Dec 31, 2014 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The MFMP replication effort live on youtube.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:39 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
In either of these three cases I would
replication effort live on youtube.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:39 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
wrote:
In either of these three cases I would expect the active device to get
hotter than had it been subjected to open air cooling. The trend is the
same.
The device may be hotter than
Ryan cemented a type-B platinum thermocouple though the center of the
plug. So he had actual data on the core temperature which got to about
1200C. The thermocouple at the surface only reported getting to about 850C
at the same time. Parkhomov measured his temperature in between - on the
Ryan Hunt (HUG, MFMP) did a post-mortem on the reactor tube from the first
experiment with the dogbone and fuel as described by Parkhomov. He found a
gross failure of the seal of the plug in the tube. Also, because he didn't
shake it to distribute the powder, the powder ended up in the opposite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVz-6XGBePM
Wow, Replication fails. They had the dog bone so hot the steel stand
holding it was white hot. But power in was equal to power out. No
radiation.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVz-6XGBePM
CB Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, Replication fails. They had the dog bone so hot the steel stand
holding it was white hot. But power in was equal to power out. No
radiation.
I have a hunch that was too hot. As the proverbial shaggy dog was too
shaggy, since we are using
I thought all they did was calibration.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Based on analysis of Lugano and Parkhomov work, excess heat begins at about
950C. The MFMP dogbone core was measured to be over 1200C and no excess
heat was found. The likely suspect is that the glue used to seal the
reactor tube failed, allowing a leak of the H2 when the LiAlH4 decomposed.
The
I guess I missed some part them. But I never saw a so beautiful metal glow!
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
As best as I could tell, it looks like this was a dud. Heat in = Heat
out. It was frustrating to see.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I guess I missed some part them. But I never saw a so beautiful metal glow!
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
It could have been worse, we could have lost heat from the universe
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, CB Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
As best as I could tell, it looks like this was a dud. Heat in = Heat
out. It was frustrating to see.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Rocha
You mean, achieved a device to bring on global cooling??
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 6:58 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
It could have been worse, we could have lost heat from the universe
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, CB Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
As best as I could tell,
42 matches
Mail list logo
