did you write this, Jed?
What is a sparge test in this context?
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly right. Rossi said this, very clearly. When he invited me, I said I
wanted to do confirmation test, where I measure temperatures independently
and
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
I know quite what Rossi would have said: Too dangerous. I emptied it just
now, so it's safe to hold this up, but water condenses inside the hose,
because the steam cools, and eventually enough will build up that boiling
hot water will spurt out
At 12:40 AM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
(Remember the skeptics evolution as a phenomenon is proved:
1. It's not true; 2. It may be true, but not important. 3. It's true
and important, but we have always known it.)
Here's the believers' progression:
1. The experiment proves it's true.
2.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 12:40 AM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
(Remember the skeptics evolution as a phenomenon is proved:
1. It's not true; 2. It may be true, but not important. 3. It's true and
important, but we have always known
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
I know quite what Rossi would have said: Too dangerous. I emptied it just
now, so it's safe to hold this up, but water condenses inside the hose,
because the steam
At 06:33 PM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Both of these pseudoskeptical [yada, yada, yada].
I have no idea what you said there, but I admit, I didn't try very
hard to understand it.
At 06:08 PM 7/15/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Having said that, I feel that Krivit should have paid more attention
to some technical details. He should have made more observations and
reported more facts, such as whether Rossi placed the feedwater
reservoir on a weight scale, and if so, how much
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/7/15 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
I must say, I'm appalled at how much time has been wasted on
inadequate demonstrations.
This is surprising considering that anyone here has never said
anything
4. scientific proof unworthy of my time, just wait a bit to see big
customers buying my huge power units in October (well, maybe
November...)
Lewan addresses, in this report, some of the issues which had been
raised by discussions.
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece
As previously, the power output was calculated from the amount of
water boiled into steam, and thus depends on the water flow. At the
2011/7/15 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
I must say, I'm appalled at how much time has been wasted on
inadequate demonstrations.
This is surprising considering that anyone here has never said
anything that those demonstrations has any scientific relevance. That
is simply because they
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
These are just demonstrations, not scientific validations. And the
purpose of them was that Rossi let some people to observe, while he
was doing his own tests for the E-Cat units. Only January
demonstration was actual demonstration.
Exactly right. Rossi said this, very
12 matches
Mail list logo
