Hi,
On 3-9-2011 18:40, Terry Blanton wrote:
A quick perusal of Jed's site shows no one seems to have tested Ni/H
stimulation in the sub-megaHertz range. Indeed, I didn't see anything
showing attempts at RF stimulation. Goodness knows that the
wavelength of phonons can certainly exist in this
Hi,
On 6-9-2011 16:31, Man on Bridges wrote:
If my memory serves me well a lot was already written about Hydrogen
and the influence of a 1 MHz frequency,
Hmmm, the following picture makes one wondering if this is a frequency
of 903,000 Hz?
Source:
Hey, ecat builder, you wouldn't happen to be a HAM, would you? Or, do
you know one? Look around your neighborhood for some who has a Rohn
25 tower in their backyard with an antenna which surely isn't seeking
My HAM license expired in 2003. And I don't have any easy way to put
wires,
It would be a fun experiment to put hydrogen in a waveguide with a
layer of nano-catalyst laying in it the far end from the magnetron,
and surround it with a water jacket. Could drive with a 600 W
microwave oven magnetron to obtain some degree of compatibility with
Rossi's tests. Might
-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Rossi Radiowave Reactor
Joe Catania [mailto:zrosumg...@aol.com] wrote:
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories popularized
so far like Widom-Larsen, Rossi's
I used to drink with a fellow at the Dime Box Saloon who had the idea
of stimulating cavitation with microwaves. I miss ole Dead-eye Dick
Macaulay. I wonder if he and Sparber get the internet where they are
now?
T
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
It
If so, I'll be the bandwidth is extraordinary! Yep, Richard and Fred
were proponents of microwave stimulation.
I think a good approach might be electrically isolating the
nanoparticles in zeolites, or in other nanopore material, in dry
hydrogen. This would permit a high frequency response,
Heh!
I suspect Sparbar and Dead-eye Dick no longer get the Internet.
They ARE the internet!
They could probably tell us a few things too. ;-)
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
When is a PLC not a PLC?
Horace, et al have mentioned the noise generated by the control box.
Originally, we thought AR's mention of a PLC meant programmable logic
controller which made no sense since (holy homonym, batman!) there
was no feedback loop. Now that we find that Red really meant
A quick perusal of Jed's site shows no one seems to have tested Ni/H
stimulation in the sub-megaHertz range. Indeed, I didn't see anything
showing attempts at RF stimulation. Goodness knows that the
wavelength of phonons can certainly exist in this range.
Hey, ecat builder, you wouldn't happen
Terry sez:
A quick perusal of Jed's site shows no one seems to have tested Ni/H
stimulation in the sub-megaHertz range. Indeed, I didn't see anything
showing attempts at RF stimulation. Goodness knows that the
wavelength of phonons can certainly exist in this range.
Hey, ecat builder,
On Sep 3, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
A quick perusal of Jed's site shows no one seems to have tested Ni/H
stimulation in the sub-megaHertz range. Indeed, I didn't see anything
showing attempts at RF stimulation. Goodness knows that the
wavelength of phonons can certainly exist in
I commented on possible use of nanopores earlier, and the possible
useful relationship to my theory:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg44662.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg44676.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg44683.html
I
...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Radiowave Reactor
I commented on possible use of nanopores earlier, and the possible useful
relationship to my theory:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg44662.html
http
in this thread.
- Original Message - From: Horace Heffner
hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Radiowave Reactor
I commented on possible use of nanopores earlier, and the
possible useful relationship to my
Joe Catania [mailto:zrosumg...@aol.com] wrote:
I'm not sanguine on any of the theories popularized
so far like Widom-Larsen, Rossi's theories, Piantelli's,
BEC, etc. They've all been discredited.
'Discredited' how???
Please don't say, Because they contradict current theories...
Are there any
16 matches
Mail list logo
