Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Bob Cook
never cease. Bob Cook - Original Message - From: Paul St. Denis paul.st.de...@stonybrook.edu To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 9:06 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_massive_black_holes On Sun, Mar 1, 2015

RE: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
Agreed! _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 8:04 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:This is where it all began? Isn’t it bizarre how most physicists will embrace that load of cosmic crap (FTL

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Alain Sepeda
cold fusion really have a problem. I've seen very conservative science forum like future science, bloggers start with a bang, or goatguy being unable to accept anything on cold fusion , despite busines, circumstantial, kilowatt, 50 sigma, isotopic, varied or identical replications... while they

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Mauro Lacy
Hi Jones, thanks, I have in fact tuned again into Vortex a couple of months ago. Cosmology is too young a science. The Universe is not only expanding, but expanding at an accelerated rate. This poses a very serious problem for any Big Bang model where the expansion energy comes for the

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread Paul St. Denis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_massive_black_holes On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Isn’t it bizarre how most physicists will embrace that load of cosmic crap (FTL expansion) without the least bit of real evidence for it (other than a

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-03-01 Thread ChemE Stewart
Spacetime, including our atmosphere is wormy stringy http://www.andersoninstitute.com/wormholes.html http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/02/23/sail-the-seven-dimensional-seas/ Earth's core is 6-D vacuum brane toroid and our weather disturbances are one more dimension warping, inflating decaying

RE: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Jones Beene
From: a.ashfield Jones, Big though it is, it is not large compared with the 100 billion galaxies in the Universe. No but it is by far the most massive structure that we presently are aware of. And the fact it has gone undetected until 2015 raises many issues about prior assumptions used in

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Eric Walker
About the big bang theory -- my understanding is that it requires faster than light expansion in the earliest period. A theory that says the rules change at some point in time seems a bit ad hoc to me. About the huge black hole -- what are the chances that it looks like a black hole from our

Re:[Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread a.ashfield
Jones, Big though it is, it is not large compared with the 100 billion galaxies in the Universe.

[Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Jones Beene
Here is a big story for Mauro Lacy, if he is still tuned into Vortex, or anyone else with cosmology credentials . http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-02/anu-afi022415.php This impossible object presents us with the distinct possibility of a new version of the Big Bang which can explain

Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began?

2015-02-28 Thread Bob Cook
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:This is where it all began? About the big bang theory -- my understanding is that it requires faster than light expansion in the earliest period. A theory that says the rules change at some point in time