@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 6:52 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
Based upon the size of the crater we should go dig it up then and
erase our national debt
On Saturday, February 23, 2013, David Roberson wrote:
I visited it once
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:27:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
And I have always
javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'mix...@bigpond.com');
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'vortex-l@eskimo.com');
Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19
most of it was
vaporized.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Jonsson davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Feb 25, 2013 3:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)
Such a large impact means it had a high speed
-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'mix...@bigpond.com');
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'vortex-l@eskimo.com');
Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
In reply
of this one.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 6:52 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)
Based upon the size of the crater we should go dig it up then and erase
and is buried under one of the rims.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Sat, 23 Feb
and is buried under one of the rims.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Sat, 23 Feb
I had a suspicion that you were joking about that.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 12:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)
Dave,
I believe
, 2013 12:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
Dave,
I believe it was a chondrite:
http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i8/Russian-Meteor-Chondrite.html
Like my usual, I was joking a bit about the overall price, I agree on
your economics.
What
javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'cheme...@gmail.com');
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'vortex-l@eskimo.com');
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 6:52 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered
(fwd)
Based upon the size of the crater we should go
Chondrite. Only small hunks, not 'big'
In Russian, but look at the picture!
http://www.mk.ru/science/space/article/2013/02/22/816801-chelyabinskiy-meteorit-priletel-v-moskvu.html
Translate: http://goo.gl/GnhJ3
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William
Only 9,999.99 tons to go! @ $2400/gram I figured it is worth $16
Trillion...
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:37 PM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
Chondrite. Only small hunks, not 'big'
In Russian, but look at the picture!
http://www.mk.ru/science/**space/article/2013/02/22/**
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:41:11 -0500
ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Only 9,999.99 tons to go!
And what happened to the remains of the Tunguska meteor???
Even if it broke up in the air, there must have been humungous
chunks of the thing lying around, but the expeditions found only
Vorl,
If you look closely at the Chixulub crater in Yucatan that occurred around
the time of the dinosaurs exit, you see hundreds ofsinkholes all
grouped along the outer rim of the perfectly round larger one. I believe
those all accompanied the larger object gravitationally as it
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:37 PM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
Chondrite. Only small hunks, not 'big'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chondrite
One of the most valuable types. Older than Sol. It will be
interesting to see what type of chondrite. Carbon types are the most
interesting.
Weight of Object10,000.00tons“
20,000,000.00lbs“ 9,080,000,000.00gramsValue per gram
2,200.00$/gmValue1.9976E+13$*“**20**trillion dollars*If it really is all
baryonic matter, it would pay of the US Debt with 4 trillion to spare.
However, I think it was hollow and
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:27:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
And I have always wondered about Meteor Crater in Arizona; I never
understood why a little digging did not expose a big chunk of
extraterrestrial rock at the centre of the crater; but there is
nothing.
Maybe it went
I visited it once and the story is that the meteorite came in at a steep angle
and is buried under one of the rims.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment
19 matches
Mail list logo
