On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Horace Heffner
This is an indication the door was opened by the blast prior to
the glass shards hitting it. The shards came through with enough
energy to cause widespread injuries. This is only consistent with
the primary energy
Horace Heffner
There was 700 grams of H2O which was heated for only ten
seconds. Mizuno was not using much power, but the heating rate
of 700 grams of water in figure on page 31 shows a rise in
water temperature of 60 C in about 10 seconds. This would
constitute an energy input of
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
The previous run provides the active setting but it cannot be
presummed that there was significant residual hydrogen in the hood
Neither can it be assumed that there was no hydrogen in the
incubator. The blast effects do not indicate the
Horace Heffner wrote:
Neither can it be assumed that there was no hydrogen in the incubator.
I doubt there was any. They usually open the incubator between runs,
to make adjustments. Also, with the outer door open the incubator is
not a bit airtight. (It is not at a constant temperature
On Jan 31, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Anyway, this discussion is irrelevant, in a sense, because there is
no question there was a huge burst of anomalous energy underwater
before the explosion, so even if the explosion was caused by
recombination of gas in the incubator, that
--- Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Anyway, this discussion is irrelevant, in a sense,
because there is no question there was a huge burst
of anomalous energy underwater before the explosion,
so even if the explosion was
caused by
> From: Jones Beene
...
> As to the damage, this is consistent with a few
> micrograms of sublimated tungsten at 17,000 degrees
> transfering heat to the water so that there was a
> flash steam explosion. The very small mass of
> accelerating material at high kinetic energy could not
> have
Jones Beene wrote:
No. Once again. A temperature rise of 17,000 degrees in 10 seconds
in the cathode is proof postive that there could have been NO
preexisting hydogen in the headspace (unless oxygen was totally absent).
Yes, I was going to say I agree with that too -- and your previous
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
The previous run provides the active setting but it cannot be
presummed that there was significant residual hydrogen in the hood
- such as if the exhaust fan totally failed - and even if there was
this is totaly unnecssary and moreover
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
No. Once again. A temperature rise of 17,000 degrees in 10 seconds
in the cathode is proof postive that there could have been NO
preexisting hydogen in the headspace (unless oxygen was totally
absent).
This is
Horace Heffner wrote:
What scale? What is the evidence such a heat release actually took
place?
I do not know how Jones Beene computed a 17,000 deg C temperature
rise (presumably in a small area on the cathode). The energy release
that is clear is 132,000 joules in 15 seconds, based on the
>From Jones Beene
...
> What the Casimir/ZPE explanation would amount to is
> that because the tungsten lattice is vibrating in the
> terahertz range, in any period of only one second, it
> might arguably be possible to cohere several eV of net
> energy from ZPE per proton/deuteron IF the
On Jan 31, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
All I can say is that NO WAY is this only a
hydrogen-only explosion - IF Dr. Mizuno has supplied
us with accurate information.
There is no evidence that prevents the possibility of the explosion
being solely hydrogen fueled, especially
From: Horace Heffner
This is an indication the door was opened by the blast prior to
the glass shards hitting it. The shards came through with
enough energy to cause widespread injuries. This is only
consistent with the primary energy of the blast being in the
1L-6 incubator, not the
Horace Heffner writes:
. . .It is possible that the tungsten cathode
may have been exposed to the gas in the headspace. (See accident
report appended below.)
He meant the headspace of the cell, not the incubator. The incubator is well
ventilated, and the gas tubes go outside it in any
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner writes:
[ ... ]
It is possible there was a leak in the cap or other leak in
the system, or that hydrogen had accumulated in the 1L-6 incubator
during prior runs.
I think that is impossible. Even if it happened the gas would not
reach a high enough
On Jan 29, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
The heat that drove the explosion was generated in the cell,
underwater. That is why the electrolyte temperature went up from 25
to 80 deg C so quickly. That heating alone required far more energy
than was input into the system.
This is not a typical JB dyslexic misspelling.
Recalescence is a most deadly phenomenon. It may have relevance
to the Mizuno explosion and certainly to the PF runaway
anomaly - which gouged out a pit in a concrete floor. I have had a
chance to go over this report with some experts who are not
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
The death toll in steel mills - due to recalescence over the centuries
is likely to be in the thousands. Yet how many of you have ever even
heard the term?
Yes, in one of the most bizarre cases of synchronocity I have
experienced lately.
On Jan 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTanomalouse.pdf
This includes the PowerPoint slides, which are interesting.
- Jed
Note the plexaglass front door of the 1L-6 incubator appears to still
be intact in
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTanomalouse.pdf
This includes the PowerPoint slides, which are interesting.
- Jed
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
He doesn't explain TSC Mechanism that I can see.
Does this stand for Tungsten/Sulfur/Calcium or what?
Is there another reference where this is explained in more detail?
TIA
Jones
Sorry I should have googled TSC first
Apparently it is TSC (Tetrahedral Symmetric Condensate) and/or
OSC(Octahedral Symmetric Condensate) ??
http://newenergytimes.com/Conf/JCF6/JCF6Abstracts.pdf
Transmutations by Metal
Akito Takahashi (Osaka University);
Although it sounds exactly like a
Jones Beene wrote:
He doesn't explain TSC Mechanism that I can see.
That's in the PowerPoint slides. It did not make it into the paper.
Is there another reference where this is explained in more detail?
This is Takahashi's theory. Look up TSC in the Google search box on
the main page:
24 matches
Mail list logo
