Re: [Vo]:New WL stuff

2013-02-26 Thread Daniel Rocha
It doesn't seem new. It dates from august last year and updated in september. 2013/2/26 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:New WL stuff

2013-02-26 Thread Axil Axil
It might not be new for Vortex. MarkI-ZeroPoint brought the effect to the attention of Vortex on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:08 PM. Vortex began discussions about this effect the next day. From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:08 PM To:

RE: [Vo]:New WL stuff

2013-02-26 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:09 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:New WL stuff It might not be new for Vortex. MarkI-ZeroPoint brought the effect to the attention of Vortex on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:08 PM. Vortex began discussions about this effect the next day. From: MarkI-ZeroPoint

Re: [Vo]:New WL stuff

2013-02-26 Thread Chuck Sites
Thank you Axil, After looking at that power point for a few hours now, it has me deeply intrigued. I really never looked into WL theory on LENR because it seemed pretty far fetched that nuclear-weak interactions could be driving the heat events. It's probably a bias I developed when

Re: [Vo]:New WL stuff

2013-02-26 Thread Rich Murray
Thanks, Chuck, for being carefully, open-mindedly curious about WL -- with a Scientific American level of understanding, I've been intrigued for years that they seem able to tie so many diverse mysteries in science to their beta-decay chains... so my hunch is, where's there's a vertical chain of