If the cooling effect is real then could also be indicative of an
unfamiliar form of energy storage.
Harry
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> @Vibrator,
>
>
>
> As you imply, some form of negative hysteresis would be the Holy Gail for
> alternative
@Vibrator,
As you imply, some form of negative hysteresis would be the Holy Gail for
alternative energy – better than LENR. I am not sure that it is fundamentally
contrary to ferromagnetism, so much as requiring a core which has both
antiferromagnetic domains or zones which are juxtaposed
Interesting thoughts from Jones here - certain viscosity effects result in
systems with time-dependent net energies - and negative hysteresis losses
would indeed be OU, since the "induced" B field would be automatically
changing under zero applied H field, and a freely-alternating
(time-varying)
I have a recent discussion of physics forums on these experiments, rather
informative, for whom is interested.
https://www.physicsforums.com/conversations/bound-states-of-spinning-magnets.80338/
message--
> *From: *H Ucar
> *Date: *Thu, Mar 24, 2016 23:23
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com;
> *Cc: *
> *Subject:*Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter
> wise spinning of magnets
>
>
> Counterwise rotation in this case is an anomaly from e
another realization of this cw spinning
> experiment at
> https://youtu.be/-XKbRrea-CA
>
>
> -- Original message--
> *From: *Vibrator !
> *Date: *Wed, Mar 23, 2016 23:15
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com;
> *Cc: *
> *Subject:*Re: [Vo]:Obtained stable magnetic bound s
In trying to find out what the phenomenon is called – the one that Hamdi refers
to – the concept of “hysteresis drag” comes up - and the concept of a
“hysteresis drag cup output device” came up in a patent.
https://www.google.com/patents/US4885489
This would be relevant if the magnetic
Apperently an direct interaction causing counterwise rotation which not consume
energy conflict with COE. This is similar to a case of a motorcyle accelerate
on a freely rotating circular track causing the track rotate backward due to
Newton's 3rd law. Even the motorcyle does not accelerates
Counterwise rotation in this case is an anomaly from engineering point of view
where there is no friction and no rigid constraints, altrough vibrations are
sources of all sort of weird things hard to model. For example rogue waves has
been never predicted and still no good model exists. Even
Thanks for the updates and clarifications, i'd inferred incorrectly that
the samples were only suspended from below and that the reason for posting
was anomolous levitation... having now watched the series on YT
everything's clear.
If you followed the original whipmag discussions, i concluded
This is true if diametrically polarised magnets are placed side by side as
gears. Al (of whipmag) termed this config as 'gearwise' and the case of magnets
spinning in same direction as 'counter gearwise'. He hed obtained cgw with a
composite magnet assembly apperently self running. I had
Photos attached. See my comments below.
https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipMlej_5bSpRg2fZ6KbaTD7RYmQ0cgvU1RXC9BpX
> Vibrator ! Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:04:38 -0700
> What are the relative polarities - are they axially or diametrically
> polarised (poles on opposite faces or same face)?
Both are
(ETA. counterclockwise synch is interesting and also easily replicable, at
least in diametrically magnetised rotors, Again though, if this is an
axially polarised levitation then this too is anomolous. Have to say,
everything's pointing to diametric polarisation - alternatig fields, so
Earnshaw
What are the relative polarities - are they axially or diametrically
polarised (poles on opposite faces or same face)?
Assuming axial magnetisation and that both are common permanent magnets,
the floating weight is levitated by reuplsion in apparent defiance of
Earnshaw's theorem (since, per
14 matches
Mail list logo